The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.3.30 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code 2 errorHandler->error_callback
/printthread.php 287 eval
/printthread.php 117 printthread_multipage



CDBZ Archive
Generic Conquest Discussion thread. - Printable Version

+- CDBZ Archive (http://alex.zulenka.com)
+-- Forum: Out of Character Forums (http://alex.zulenka.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: Other Games (http://alex.zulenka.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=26)
+---- Forum: Conquest Minigame (http://alex.zulenka.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=56)
+---- Thread: Generic Conquest Discussion thread. (/showthread.php?tid=14111)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6


Generic Conquest Discussion thread. - Rafael - 05-10-2009

Well, next game I think I'm going Changeling or human 'cuz I like the income bonuses even if I pretty much ignore the spy part, so I guess we can try it again then.


Generic Conquest Discussion thread. - Jack - 05-10-2009

Jonathan Meer Wrote:Yeah. This game was fun for awhile, and it was great to bitch-slap Rod around (and get bitch-slapped when he got 5 turns), but now that there are actual alliances forming up, and phone calls to girlfriends, I'm not sure I care quite enough to go to THOSE extremes.

Maybe lesser extremes. Not those.

roflmao!

I <3 Meer


Generic Conquest Discussion thread. - Jack - 05-10-2009

Are we upping that 10% for the next round?


Generic Conquest Discussion thread. - Kaden - 05-10-2009

Quote:It is 100% up to whoever is running the game.



Generic Conquest Discussion thread. - Pinky - 05-10-2009

Who's running the next game? I assume it's me/Josh, but I don't know if someone else called it before I did. :O


Generic Conquest Discussion thread. - Jack - 05-10-2009

Can I be added to "the list" (assuming it's real)?


Generic Conquest Discussion thread. - Ashe - 05-10-2009

Kaden Wrote:Lawl

It is 100% up to whoever is running the game.

Yeah, like I said, its one of the changes I wish I'd made. I was worried that moving the turn stock up by ten was too far, but it was no where near far enough.

Chris, Rod, Oriole. Final time, take it to that other thread. I said I was going to start passing out warnings if you guys were arguing in the other threads, and I'm trying to avoid that.


Generic Conquest Discussion thread. - Jonathan Meer - 05-10-2009

You must be operating from some definition of 'arguing' I am unfamiliar with.


Generic Conquest Discussion thread. - Ashe - 05-10-2009

Jonathan Meer Wrote:You must be operating from some definition of 'arguing' I am unfamiliar with.

I pretty much figured this would be your response.


Generic Conquest Discussion thread. - Jonathan Meer - 05-11-2009

In other words, you predicted I'd point out a flaw in your post/argument/what-evs? And still posted it?


Generic Conquest Discussion thread. - Ashe - 05-11-2009

Jonathan Meer Wrote:In other words, you predicted I'd point out a flaw in your post/argument/what-evs? And still posted it?

Anything I say in response is a response that I shouldn't make, so I'll leave it at this: If you decide to keep instigating things, I will just warn you. You are intelligent enough to know the difference, and if you and I disagree on that, I'm sorry. I made you a specific thread to prevent you from sitting in other threads and on Chatbox throwing out random hooks in hopes that he'll reply.

That's all I'm saying on the matter. Its your choice how it continues from here.


Generic Conquest Discussion thread. - Jonathan Meer - 05-11-2009

You are misreading me.

After this post, I will be sure not to be self-referential in any topic except the quarantine you so aptly generated.


Generic Conquest Discussion thread. - Kaden - 05-11-2009

Thank you.

Its appreciated.


Generic Conquest Discussion thread. - Jonathan Meer - 05-11-2009

An individual (who may or may not be me) is overjoyed at the prospect of earning a tittle of your appreciation.


Generic Conquest Discussion thread. - Kaden - 05-11-2009

Never said it was appreciated by me.


Generic Conquest Discussion thread. - Rafael - 05-11-2009

One thing I think that could be changed is the random O and D rolls, the numbers tightened a little bit. Hitting for anywhere from 280 to 430k is kinda huge if you ask me, especially if both people have massive variables like that. Just my opinion though.


Generic Conquest Discussion thread. - Pinky - 05-11-2009

What are the stats of the game set to? I know there's a sticky thread already, but I remember Tim saying something about the numbers looking as if they had been changed and was just wondering what the deal is. Can I take the numbers posted in the sticky at face-value?


Generic Conquest Discussion thread. - Pinky - 05-11-2009

Addendum: can spies be enabled to loot gold from enemies? On the offense/defense history tables there is a "loot" column and number available for them as well as the troops, and I was just wondering if it was possible.


Generic Conquest Discussion thread. - Ashe - 05-11-2009

Rod Hardwood Wrote:Addendum: can spies be enabled to loot gold from enemies? On the offense/defense history tables there is a "loot" column and number available for them as well as the troops, and I was just wondering if it was possible.

If it is, it was something that I didn't have access to. Its one of my biggest gripes at the moment.

Speaking of, I'm considering ending this round on the 15th at midnight.

Any objections?


Generic Conquest Discussion thread. - Alura - 05-11-2009

Please do.