+- CDBZ Archive (http://alex.zulenka.com)
+-- Forum: Forum Games (http://alex.zulenka.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=274)
+--- Forum: CDBZ Apprentice (http://alex.zulenka.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=170)
+--- Thread: Boardroom 1 (/showthread.php?tid=24445)
Boardroom 1 - Burter - 01-30-2005
Zarbon
Lord Slug
Furiza- Team Admin
Gohan
Android 20
Garlic Jr
Krillen
Janemba
HellFighter 17
Alright, guys, here is how it works. Basically, the staff will occasionally ask questions in this thread until Raditzu is satisfied. You guys can argue with each other, plead your cases, whatever it takes to be fired.
So, let me start us off, and any staff members can come in with their comments or questions.
Who do you think should be fired?
Did Furiza step up as a good Team Admin?
Who was your strongest asset?
Check this thread often, staff members will likely post their thoughts
Boardroom 1 - Toshiro - 01-30-2005
Quote:Originally posted by Burter
Who do you think should be fired?
Did Furiza step up as a good Team Admin?
Who was your strongest asset?
I don't know who should be fired. Ever one of the team did attempt to put some sort of input in to the final producted.
Furiza steped up to a be a fairly decent TA. Granted the misfortune of his needed absence did leave us hanging for a while, it couldn't be help. So personally I think he did well.
The strongest asset had to of been Slug. He helped a great deal with not only my work, but with other people's & even took on additional work.
Boardroom 1 - Android-18 - 01-30-2005
I really dunno what to say...When I went to your guys' forum, I just turned away. It looked disorganized and cluttered. I Also noted that Slug was doing a lot of the work, isn't Freiza the TA? I can understand if he were busy, and I think you guys mentioned sharing or something, but I dunno Slug just seemed to be doing a lot of the work.
Anyway, I'd like to know your reasons why for saying who you think should be fired, such as who you thought didn't pull their weight, didn't do their job.
I think you guys did a great job, but you didn't do it the right way
. I migt add more, I'm starving to death so its hard to think XD.
Boardroom 1 - Krillin - 01-30-2005
I'm with Janemba on this one. No one stands out to me as someone who should be fired.
Furiza was a pretty good TA. He assumed command and made sure things got done. The fact that he had to leave was unfortunate. The fact that my Workshop submission was never added into the final rules is, I think, even more unfortunate.
Our strongest asset had to be Lord Slug, no doubt. He was constantly checking everything, to make sure it was all spotless.
And there you have it. Quite a shame, this first round was.
Boardroom 1 - Zarbon - 01-30-2005
I don't think anyone should be fired, we all did a great job. But if it had to be anyone...lets see here...Oh damn I can't think of one.
Furiza? He was great, though I didn't like getting a small job just about spamming, meh, its important I guess, he took control right away and gave everyone assignments, and it really helped.
Our greatest asset? I have to agree with Janemba, he made posts for us all, helped us out alot, gave some advice. It was like he was second banana to Furiza, and he took it very seriously.
Boardroom 1 - Burter - 01-30-2005
I don't want anymore "no one stands out as who should be fired." I want to know WHO should be fired, so answer me with a name, damnit >.<
Boardroom 1 - Krillin - 01-30-2005
But everyone did an excellent job. It's tough.
If I absolutely had to go with someone, it would be Zarbon. Coming up with someone took deliberation, and a re-check through all the tasks. No hard feelings against him whatsoever, and perhaps it was the fact that he got a simple spam description as his entire job, but it just felt like his part was not very fleshed-out.
Instead of picking out who was deficient, I had to pick the one who was least beneficial. And it was still tough. Sorry Zarbon.
Boardroom 1 - Hellfighter 17 - 01-30-2005
TO BURTER'S QUESTIONS:
I'm not really sure of who should be fired, to me it's more of a question of which people(as in plural) did not do the best of what they could, or what they should have. If I have to say, though, I think Zarbon since he could have tried to put more content into his section.
EDIT: Such as he could have added more for description about my section, as I asked him to in the thread.
Furiza, to me, did a really good job up 'til he he was needed else where. I'm sure if he were around longer, he could have done more, but he did a good job about being TA and when I had any question(s), he was on to answer, since I was done before he was done. I thought I would have more to say about him, but since he wasn't around when things were ready to be put all together, which is where I would've had something to say, but he had fair cause.
I do not really think we have a strongest asset. Although many people say Slug was a big one, the fact that he made a thread for each people's task and posted what would be in it kind of angered me a bit. Since the people would then need to post them again if they wanted to edit, which I find fairly pointless, but he did do a bit more than necassary, for that reason, he would not be the strongest. There is also no best asset because most people did their jobs which were assigned to them.
Boardroom 1 - Toshiro - 01-30-2005
ok.. One single person.. Zarbon.. I say Zarb becuase he seemed to only input on one subject, his. And even that did seem some what poorly done.. I also accept that I did a piss poor job of putting the rule's togther. I appologize to ever one about that. I feel really bad becuase I in a sense feel it's my fault we're in here..
Boardroom 1 - Zarbon - 01-30-2005
I was given a small job, give me a break.
Anyway, if I had to pick someone, it would be Krillin, no offense.
Why? He got something for a whole forum, and it was very poorly done to me.
Boardroom 1 - Krillin - 01-30-2005
Quote:Originally posted by Zarbon
Anyway, if I had to pick someone, it would be Krillin, no offense.
Why? He got something for a whole forum, and it was very poorly done to me.
None taken. Had I a choice of what I would've done, I would've taken something other than the Workshop. I know very little about the forum, and about image sizing. It was tough to make rules for a board that I didn't really know the in's-and-out's of.
Perhaps mine was the weakest link, but it was never even added in the rules. Check it out here: Krillin's Task
Boardroom 1 - Hellfighter 17 - 01-30-2005
Quote:Originally posted by ZarbonNobody should be given any breaks, this is to decide who should become staff. I must say, for Krillin, I think he did a fair job, for the fact that his forum was actually a small task and he put in as much as I would probably think of.
I was given a small job, give me a break.
Anyway, if I had to pick someone, it would be Krillin, no offense.
Why? He got something for a whole forum, and it was very poorly done to me.
Boardroom 1 - Ruhiel - 01-30-2005
Ugh, I really hate pointing fingers at anyone. We each did a great job in my opinion, and I honestly don't think anyone on our team deserves to be fired. I don't want to say any names, but you refuse to let us be indecisive, so I guess I just have to throw a name out there. Since I have to pick, I would have to say Zarbon. I understand he had a smaller topic to undertake, which wasn't exactly fair for him in this case. I don't feel like it's fair that he should be singled out for this either, but just by comparing his rules to everyone elses, his lacked something. Several other people gave examples of things in their topic, which could have made it a little better. I'm sorry Zarbon, but it was immensely difficult for me to decide, and I just had to compare each person's work.
As far as Furiza did as a team admin, he did a great job I'd think. As soon as the task was known, he immediatley organized the team and handed us assignments. I completely understand him having to leave during the task, as I would have done in his position. Family comes first.
Most valuable team asset, I'd have to say Slug. The fact that he created threads for each of us was nothing special, but he did extra work that he didn't need to do, and he did a great deal for this team.
Boardroom 1 - Zarbon - 01-30-2005
Quote:Originally posted by Hell Fighter 17
Quote:Originally posted by ZarbonNobody should be given any breaks, this is to decide who should become staff. I must say, for Krillin, I think he did a fair job, for the fact that his forum was actually a small task and he put in as much as I would probably think of.
I was given a small job, give me a break.
Anyway, if I had to pick someone, it would be Krillin, no offense.
Why? He got something for a whole forum, and it was very poorly done to me.
I was putting in a small joke to lighten the mood, even though this is a serious discussion, that is no reason to lose your sense of humour.
Boardroom 1 - Tobias - 01-30-2005
Who do you think should be fired?
I dont think anyone deserved to be fired. If pressed, I mean under threat of castration-type pressed, Id say Zarbon. He seeme to put the least effort into it.
Did Furiza step up as a good Team Admin?
I think he did very well, but I would have done things differently. For one, and I posted my concerns on it, he mentioned no uniform format for us to follow. It would have made it look better- more professonable and less like ten people put it together. Another thing was that he wasnt all that active in coaching us, that job was handled by Slug, who did a very good job about it... but it wasnt his job. It isnt his fault that he had to leave so I wont hold it against him.
Who was your strongest asset?
Slug, he acted lived up to assistant TA, and beyond.
Boardroom 1 - Zarbon - 01-30-2005
Hell, you might as well just kill me off right now, as long as you give me some last words to these pity folk
.
Boardroom 1 - Burter - 01-30-2005
Defend yourself all you want, Zarbon. It's not them that decides who leaves, it's Raditzu.
Boardroom 1 - Ruhiel - 01-30-2005
I'm going to step up to defend Zarbon here, even though I voted against him.
It's really not his fault that he got such a dismally small task. I realize that him having such a small topic to work with makes it seem like he did very little work. It's not fair to judge him when he was at a disadvantage at the beginning. He did a good job in my opinion with his assigned task. All I'm saying is that Zarbon doesn't deserve to be fired just because he got unlucky.
Boardroom 1 - Burter - 01-30-2005
I disagree. I'm not saying Zarbon was good or bad, but the spam topic is actually a very big issue so I don't like how people say it's a "small task" It's only small cause Zarbon made it that way
Boardroom 1 - Ruhiel - 01-30-2005
When I said small task, I meant as in not much to write about. Spam is very important, but also pretty straightforward. You've got the good, the bad, and the ugly. Zarbon did well at identifying what spam is somewhat allowable, and what spam is completely unnecessary. Also, smaller rule size can be a good thing as well. The more compact the rules, the less intimidating they are and the easier they are to understand.