07-24-2012, 02:53 AM
Pinky Wrote:Still trying to disprove that the games actually happened with number theory and using the phrase "opponent in argumentation" is another example of how you're a parody of the pseudointellectual. This has got to be trolling. My point is that the game is broken because this shit happens. Since you decided to jump in and defend this awful system now you're just trying throw numbers up as an excuse to ignore reality. But keep flailing, I'm sure I'll get bored eventually and you can declare victory when I completely lose interest.
1) You've fundamentally misunderstood my argument. I'm not attempting to disprove that the games actually happened. 0.3% does not mean never. I don't doubt that you played a game where you only had 3 lands in the first 20 cards you drew. My point is, however, that the best way to minimize the impact of these aberrations on a tournament is to increase the number of games that are played in a set. Thus, instead of a X% chance that someone gets completely fucked over, it's X%^5 (assuming a five game set).
2) I'm not trolling.
3) I again invite you to point out the error in the mathematics I've presented so far, if they are as meaningless as you say. I've heard a lot of bluster from you on this point, but no actual analysis.
![[Image: av50fd.png]](http://i55.tinypic.com/av50fd.png)
Mal Nova Wrote:I do apologize for using the word rape. There are four separate definitions for the word rape, two of which describe vegetation...

