05-16-2007, 05:39 AM
Zangya vs Garlic Junior
The ideas behind your post were great. Your writing of GJ was brief and vague enough to avoid bunnying, but was characteristic enough to make the reader feel like you had a decent enough handel on your opponent's character.
The biggest problem I had with reading your post was... well... reading your post. The flow of your writing definitely needs some work. It doesn't seem as though you've actually read what you've written and I think that would go a long way to help you improve. And when I say "read" I mean actually read out loud. Speak the words. The very first sentence is a perfect example:
Yowza. That's a mouth full. Normally, when people are writing somewhere like Chubbs, I try to ignore run-ons and fragments and minor conventional errors (unless they're a particularly good writer, then you gotta nit-pick) but you have some pretty serious structural problems with your post. What I quoted wouldn't be nearly so bad if it hadn't been the first thing the writer read. The other thing I wanted to point out, in the same vein, was dialouge. Specifically this piece of dialouge:
Its an awkward read and a definitely clunky and its supposed to be something that someone is actually saying. Infinitely moreso than narrative prose, dialouge has to be believable. There's a more substantial burden on a writer where dialouge is concerned because dialouge helps shape a characters demeanor and personality. If the character is supposed to talk in a very unorthodox, awkward way, then so be it -- that's not the case here.
The other somewhat negative critism I have is that, while the what you wrote was idealistically good, there was very little content. When the post started, Zangya and GJ were facing off and GJ had just been "blinded." When your post ended, Zangya and GJ were facing off and GJ had just been "blinded." There was a minor exchange, but not very much happened. There needs to be substantial enough content in your post for whoever you're writing with to play off of. If your partner(s) end up being forced to come with plot progression on their own over and over again, they're not going to want to post at all. Just imagine that you're the one that has to post again; you want to give "yourself" as much to work with as possible.
Ok. I know that that sounds like a lot more con than it is pro, but I'm not saying that your post was bad or that you're a bad writer. I think you definitely have the creativity and ability to write very enveloping and dynamic roleplays. Being able to do that, however, means taking the time to refine your technique and learn the little tricks that can really help you out. Like I said in the first paragraph, I think you have some great ideas in your writing and, despite what I said above, they come through in your writing. If you stick with it, I think you could definitely be one of the better writers here at Chubbs.
---------------
I don't normally try to be such a CnC whore, but this was an all fighting post and I wanted to see how it worked out.
I'd also like to say that I do my best to give as detailed and thoughtful critism as I can, and I would appreciate if others do the same in return. Two or three line replies don't sit well with me. No one here is a perfect writer (I'd argue there's no such thing as "perfect" writing) so just saying "it was great now please read mine" is a pretty lame thing to do.
Burter vs Raditzu
My second post in that thread, if you don't mind.
The ideas behind your post were great. Your writing of GJ was brief and vague enough to avoid bunnying, but was characteristic enough to make the reader feel like you had a decent enough handel on your opponent's character.
The biggest problem I had with reading your post was... well... reading your post. The flow of your writing definitely needs some work. It doesn't seem as though you've actually read what you've written and I think that would go a long way to help you improve. And when I say "read" I mean actually read out loud. Speak the words. The very first sentence is a perfect example:
Quote:Originally posted by Zangya
Zangya situated her lanky figure as she lifted herself up from the floor subsequent to her most recent assault on the petite lime skinned midget, sending a swaggering sneer towards her hindered adversary.
Yowza. That's a mouth full. Normally, when people are writing somewhere like Chubbs, I try to ignore run-ons and fragments and minor conventional errors (unless they're a particularly good writer, then you gotta nit-pick) but you have some pretty serious structural problems with your post. What I quoted wouldn't be nearly so bad if it hadn't been the first thing the writer read. The other thing I wanted to point out, in the same vein, was dialouge. Specifically this piece of dialouge:
Quote:Originally posted by Zangya
?And this time, I?m not going to make the same mistake that I had made the last time you were in this position.["]
Its an awkward read and a definitely clunky and its supposed to be something that someone is actually saying. Infinitely moreso than narrative prose, dialouge has to be believable. There's a more substantial burden on a writer where dialouge is concerned because dialouge helps shape a characters demeanor and personality. If the character is supposed to talk in a very unorthodox, awkward way, then so be it -- that's not the case here.
The other somewhat negative critism I have is that, while the what you wrote was idealistically good, there was very little content. When the post started, Zangya and GJ were facing off and GJ had just been "blinded." When your post ended, Zangya and GJ were facing off and GJ had just been "blinded." There was a minor exchange, but not very much happened. There needs to be substantial enough content in your post for whoever you're writing with to play off of. If your partner(s) end up being forced to come with plot progression on their own over and over again, they're not going to want to post at all. Just imagine that you're the one that has to post again; you want to give "yourself" as much to work with as possible.
Ok. I know that that sounds like a lot more con than it is pro, but I'm not saying that your post was bad or that you're a bad writer. I think you definitely have the creativity and ability to write very enveloping and dynamic roleplays. Being able to do that, however, means taking the time to refine your technique and learn the little tricks that can really help you out. Like I said in the first paragraph, I think you have some great ideas in your writing and, despite what I said above, they come through in your writing. If you stick with it, I think you could definitely be one of the better writers here at Chubbs.
---------------
I don't normally try to be such a CnC whore, but this was an all fighting post and I wanted to see how it worked out.
I'd also like to say that I do my best to give as detailed and thoughtful critism as I can, and I would appreciate if others do the same in return. Two or three line replies don't sit well with me. No one here is a perfect writer (I'd argue there's no such thing as "perfect" writing) so just saying "it was great now please read mine" is a pretty lame thing to do.
Burter vs Raditzu
My second post in that thread, if you don't mind.
![[Image: RadOct.jpg]](http://frozendust.com/sig/raditzu/RadOct.jpg)
"In this world, his world, life is just a game you play"


![[Image: BurterJune08.jpg]](http://frozendust.com/sig/dbz/BurterJune08.jpg)
![[Image: retanesigcopy.png]](http://i92.photobucket.com/albums/l17/brilovessah22805/retanesigcopy.png)
![[Image: Deo.jpg]](http://frozendust.com/sig/miscsig/Deo.jpg)