| The following warnings occurred: | |||||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.5.12 (Linux)
|
![]() |
|
Freakin....god...damn...idiots - Printable Version +- CDBZ Archive (http://alex.zulenka.com) +-- Forum: Out of Character Forums (http://alex.zulenka.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Forum: The Legendary Asylum (http://alex.zulenka.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=133) +--- Thread: Freakin....god...damn...idiots (/showthread.php?tid=40027) Pages:
1
2
|
Freakin....god...damn...idiots - Raditzu - 06-18-2007 No, wikipedia is not a credible source. I can say that I'm jesus and list some web site that says that that's true. Doesn't mean its credible. Freakin....god...damn...idiots - Mowgli - 06-18-2007 Raditzu Wrote:God I hate wikipedia. So you hate youtube and wikipedia. Why? Freakin....god...damn...idiots - Nori - 06-18-2007 What is not credible on Wikipedia is flagged by the community. I'v never seen a article on Wikipedia that was false. Freakin....god...damn...idiots - Amadeus - 06-18-2007 The problem with Wikipedia is that some idiots might get the bright idea to write something stupid (like an insult) in a completely inappropriate thread. Some also might have a subjective view on the topic at hand. However, it is true most such articles either don`t have sources or their neutrality is disputed. The links I gave seem credible enough and explain the point we are trying to make. Freakin....god...damn...idiots - Deo - 06-18-2007 It's true. I've fucking fought for WEEKS on shit I KNEW was right only to be proven wrong by the staff there. XD So...yeah. They're credible on most things. Freakin....god...damn...idiots - Burter - 06-18-2007 Most of my issues there have been on format, rather then information. Like, what's appropriate for the article and what isn't. |