The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.5.12 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code 2 errorHandler->error_callback
/printthread.php 287 eval
/printthread.php 117 printthread_multipage



CDBZ Archive
RAGE Thread - Printable Version

+- CDBZ Archive (http://alex.zulenka.com)
+-- Forum: Out of Character Forums (http://alex.zulenka.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: Other Games (http://alex.zulenka.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=26)
+---- Forum: League of Legends (http://alex.zulenka.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=28)
+---- Thread: RAGE Thread (/showthread.php?tid=16473)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21


RAGE Thread - Super Buu - 08-25-2011

Only if you agree to have Final Destination playing in the background.


RAGE Thread - Rafael - 08-26-2011

Looks like Britain has to annex Texas. Shucks... >.>


RAGE Thread - Super Buu - 08-26-2011

I challenge anyone to take me with the same rules, any champ you wanna try. 420 MID MALZAHAR EVERY DAY. Granted I know one champ that I will for sure lose to.

We also went no summoner spells and masteries for pure awesomeness, though B-ing is allowed (since destroying the tower = win). Duels are actually pretty fun.


RAGE Thread - Ashe - 08-26-2011

Rafael Wrote:Looks like Britain has to annex Texas. Shucks... >.>

Someone should. We don't want it.


RAGE Thread - Kaden - 08-26-2011

Rose Wrote:I challenge anyone to take me with the same rules, any champ you wanna try. 420 MID MALZAHAR EVERY DAY. Granted I know one champ that I will for sure lose to.

Deal, but Summoners and Masteries have to be allowed. Using them effectively is just as much a part of the game as knowing your champion.


RAGE Thread - Super Buu - 08-26-2011

Had SUCH a close Malz-off with Kaden. This time it was win by kill instead of tower. I was running around on very low health, him on very low mana - and I juuust managed to catch him with the pool-ult combo for the win. Can we get a third challenger? Does anyone else dare to test their skills?


RAGE Thread - Anzekay - 08-26-2011

Rose Wrote:Only if you agree to have Final Destination playing in the background.

I always have this playing when I mid as Kog'maw


RAGE Thread - John Doe - 08-27-2011

I'm going to go ahead and put a list of people I refuse to play with from now on.

In no particular order:
Civik
Weemus
Helixagon
Maruset
Daeg Waedos
Undrask

If one of these players happen to be in the game with you, don't invite me. Don't want to waste my time.


RAGE Thread - Orion - 08-27-2011

Don't worry. No one will want to invite you.


RAGE Thread - Super Buu - 08-27-2011

Go ahead and list everyone, because nobody wants to play with you =O


RAGE Thread - John Doe - 08-27-2011

Orion Wrote:Don't worry. No one will want to invite you.

Rose Wrote:Go ahead and list everyone, because nobody wants to play with you =O

Coming from 2 guys who sat in base and afk'd. Yes, nobody would EVER want to play with a player who actually plays the game. Silly me.


RAGE Thread - Sigfried Hunin - 08-27-2011

John Doe is a fag about games apparently

EDIT: lol


RAGE Thread - Ashe - 08-27-2011

Sigfried Hunin Wrote:John Doe is a fag about games apparently

EDIT: lol

Completely unnecessary.


RAGE Thread - Sigfried Hunin - 08-27-2011

As was his post. It's just inflammatory. If you make a flaming post and make it look clean it's still a flaming post.

I'm just more to the point than he is.


RAGE Thread - Ashe - 08-27-2011

Sigfried Hunin Wrote:As was his post. It's just inflammatory. If you make a flaming post and make it look clean it's still a flaming post.

I'm just more to the point than he is.

His post is first stating that he's not going to play with certain people anymore, without going further into it. His second post is him responding sarcastically to another acceptable post and pointing out the actions that lead him to his first post.

Your post was "John Doe is a fag about games apparently", followed by Hmm, that wasn't quite enough... - "EDIT: lol".


RAGE Thread - Sigfried Hunin - 08-27-2011

Ashe Wrote:His post is first stating that he's not going to play with certain people anymore, without going further into it. His second post is him responding sarcastically to another acceptable post and pointing out the actions that lead him to his first post.

Your post was "John Doe is a fag about games apparently", followed by Hmm, that wasn't quite enough... - "EDIT: lol".

... If you choose to ignore the inflammatory and BLATANTLY insulting nature of his post, bully for you. I'm not gonna just ignore that. I'm not going to be degraded as such in a public forum for no reason whatsoever. I'm not playing this political shit. If he doesn't like it, then he should just ignore the comment as much as I am expected to ignore his.

You're right. It wasn't enough to say he's a fag about games, which he is, I decided to clarify that it was humorous to me.

In closing: Fuck you, John Doe! Smile Sorry we aren't your perfect play partners, I guess your loud, whining screaming and irritating play style that involves blaming others for failures and takign credit for wins will be GRACED upon someone else.


RAGE Thread - Ashe - 08-27-2011

This discussion can continue either with on topic comments as to the whys and why nots of what happened, without resorting to the above. If it can not, then I will either remove participants from the discussion or I will close the topic.

I don't mind a "rage post" about being upset over something that happened in game. Spending the entire time throwing insults and taking a "fight the man!" approach is not what I'd recommend.

Its your choices: New topic, new thread, or continue in this one with a new approach.


RAGE Thread - John Doe - 08-27-2011

Whatever. I was done with my second post.


RAGE Thread - Sigfried Hunin - 08-27-2011

To John Doe:

I cordially wish to request to petition to input my opinion of my believe that both your in-game conduct and out-of-game conduct is both RAGE inducing and barring of any additional desire I have to play with you, or interact with you on any other level.

This has been a RAGE post, which related to the Game League of Legends, as introduced By Sigfried.


RAGE Thread - Super Buu - 08-27-2011

Edit: UNNECESSARY