The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.5.12 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code 2 errorHandler->error_callback
/printthread.php 287 eval
/printthread.php 117 printthread_multipage



CDBZ Archive
The Oscars! - Printable Version

+- CDBZ Archive (http://alex.zulenka.com)
+-- Forum: Out of Character Forums (http://alex.zulenka.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: The Legendary Asylum (http://alex.zulenka.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=133)
+--- Thread: The Oscars! (/showthread.php?tid=13658)

Pages: 1 2 3

The Oscars! - Juno - 03-07-2009

I'm not arguing puppeteering. Puppetering is a work of art. However, I'm still going to have to go with as much as I love Yoda and as much as I think that was a perfect performance, it was still only a voice. Things like Dr. Manhattan and Gollum, where the actor actually does act, his appeareance is just fitted to the CGI model later, could be considered for Best Actor. However, things where the actor only has to use their voice -- i.e Yoda in ROTJ, Audrey II in Little Shop of Horrors, Coraline, Wall-E -- it can't be argued that these performance measure up to live acting.

And I'm just arguing about Best Actor/Actress. Think what you wish about Best Picture.

The Oscars! - Jack - 03-07-2009

Rod Hardwood Wrote:wut?

Do you understand the concept of "acting"?

Apparently not. Sorry.

The Oscars! - Pinky - 03-07-2009

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PcjnbIF1yAA

That's Frank Oz doing the puppetry right beneath Yoda. This is not "only a voice."

Bil Baer Jaxx Wrote:Apparently not. Sorry.
Sometimes I want to believe that you're joking, but I just don't know.