+- CDBZ Archive (http://alex.zulenka.com)
+-- Forum: Out of Character Forums (http://alex.zulenka.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: The Legendary Asylum (http://alex.zulenka.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=133)
+--- Thread: 'Ey, Chrome Dome (/showthread.php?tid=30049)
'Ey, Chrome Dome - Krillin - 02-11-2006
You can try http://www.vgmusic.com, but I doubt it'd have vocals if it had it at all.
'Ey, Chrome Dome - Violet - 02-11-2006
haha, I tried that. no luck. If i just had the song title, I could look it up with better results...
'Ey, Chrome Dome - Super Buu - 02-11-2006
Quote:Originally posted by Jeice
There's no such thing as too long.
Lies. Personally after a while of playing the same game I tend to get tired of it. Which is what happens with Final Fantasys. Then when I try to get back in a month later I can't remember what the hell is going on. Which is why I now have FF8, 9 and 10 all on 'near-completed'.
'Ey, Chrome Dome - Kami - 02-11-2006
Chrono Trigger
'Ey, Chrome Dome - Piccolo Daimoun - 02-11-2006
Quote:Originally posted by Kami
Chrono Trigger
Rocks your socks.
'Ey, Chrome Dome - Krillin - 02-12-2006
Quote:Originally posted by King Vegeta
I cried when Queen Brahnne died. She was hot.
Damn you. Way to stick in a spoiler.
Quote:Originally posted by Jeice
Actually, not so. That wasn't my point at all. I was saying the guy looked butt ugly, not that he looked weird. XD
Under the mask, Darth Vader is a prune. He's still one of the coolest villains of all time, if not THE coolest.
Quote:Originally posted by Jeice
My point was, talking about looking beautiful and having great atmosphere isn't really fair when you compare the two at this day and age. Back when PS1 was top marks, FF7 was probably one of -the- most beautiful RPGs ever to exist. Of course other games will come out on the next gen and be better -looking-, but I'm sure if someone were to remake FF7 with current gen specs, it'd blow FF10 away.
Doesn't really matter. When I refer to atmosphere, it has nothing to do with the actual graphics of the system. It's got to do with the feeling the game gives you when you think about the story. FFX wins.
And yeah, graphically, FFX pwns. I'm graphically-oriented. I don't care if FF7 could be the l33t n00b ownage if it was redone. It hasn't been redone. I'll stick with FFX, thank you.
If FF7 is really so much better than FFX, it should be able to stick up for itself, instead of needing someone to put everything in "perspective" with assumption and speculation.
Quote:Originally posted by Jeice
No I didn't. I bought it and beat it when I got Anthology and that other one for the PS1. The ports with some extra stuff. I beat it easy and didn't get too into the storyline. I was surprised, since I usually love 2-D games, be them side scrollers or RPGs. I loved FF4, 5, tactics, CT, and the BOF series, but for some reason, FF6 didn't quite hook me like the others.
Quote:Originally posted by Krillin
You missed out. It's a fantastic game. Best music out of any Final Fantasy to date.
'Ey, Chrome Dome - Zarbon - 02-12-2006
Quote:Originally posted by Kami
Chrono Trigger
Best game ever. Frog for teh win!
Oh. And, Happy Birthday Krill. Though...I'm a bit late. >.>
'Ey, Chrome Dome - Bra - 02-12-2006
Indeed. Exorbitantly late.
Happy Birthday, Krillin. Don't let the FF7 fanboys maul you too badly. ^_^;
'Ey, Chrome Dome - Violet - 02-13-2006
I really wish you two would stop fighting over freakin ff. its a game. get over it. yes, both are cool. we get the point. go play outside somewhere and cool off.
'Ey, Chrome Dome - Hellfighter 17 - 02-13-2006
What's so bad about them debating? As long as it is done with civility, why is it so bad? Technically you yourself just argued that they should stop arguing. o.O
'Ey, Chrome Dome - Violet - 02-13-2006
Because I am tired of hearing the bickering over the same thing. that is why. If they switched it up and said that, for instance, GTA 3 is better than GTA4, well, there. ha. GTA4 wins.
'Ey, Chrome Dome - Super Buu - 02-13-2006
Squall is emo.
Discuss.
'Ey, Chrome Dome - Hellfighter 17 - 02-13-2006
Quote:Originally posted by JeicePfft.
Quote:Originally posted by Violet
Because I am tired of hearing the bickering over the same thing. that is why. If they switched it up and said that, for instance, GTA 3 is better than GTA4, well, there. ha. GTA4 wins.
...'cept GTA gets boring after half an hour, and it makes me wish for a real third person shooter. Like Socom.
'Ey, Chrome Dome - Krillin - 02-13-2006
Quote:Originally posted by Jeice
Yeah, but there aren't many fangirls out there saying he's sexy. Which was kind of the whole starting point for what I said. >_>
I've seen two. Most of the clamor I've heard is over Cloud (an epileptic wuss) and Squall (a disturbed, angsty emo). Sephiroth is also heard quite often as well. Regardless, I don't think Seymour's sexy (obviously). I do think he's a great villain, though, actually having three dimensions to his personality, unlike a certain white-haired long-sword pimp we all know and loathe.
Quote:Originally posted by Jeice
Actually, it did, back when it's technology was even in the running. The fact you started out with the whole rainbow of FF kind of gives the newer ones an advantage over the older ones. Why do you think it was one of the first PS1 RPGs to make it to greatest hits?
Because it was fantastic for its time. Agreed. Just because it was fantastic for its time, though, doesn't mean I'm going to fast for a week out of respect for it. Now, it simply fades away in the light of other, better games. Same thing happened with Pong. Pong was the pimpness back in the day, but who would actually consider staying up all night to play Pong with their friends?
And before someone replies to this saying "Ohmagawd, I would!", shaddap. You seriously need to reassess what you call "fun" if you're willing to play the simplest, most dumbed-down version of ping-pong ever put onto a video screen.
Quote:Originally posted by Jeice
...that doesn't even make sense. I didn't miss anything, I played it. I even got the CD with the game's soundtrack on it. I think. I just didn't like it.
Effectively, I'm saying that you ended up not liking one of the best RPGs ever made. An arrogant statement on my part, and certainly one aligned to the very thing I'm arguing with you about. It was sorta meant to be uber l33t irony, but I suppose I was too subtle with it. :/
Quote:Originally posted by Violet
I really wish you two would stop fighting over freakin ff. its a game. get over it. yes, both are cool. we get the point. go play outside somewhere and cool off.
If you don't like it, you could always just stay out of this topic. *shrug*
'Ey, Chrome Dome - Tobias - 02-13-2006
I hope 12 will be good enough to provide as heated a debate as this in the future.
'Ey, Chrome Dome - Bra - 02-13-2006
Okay.
1) Jeice, as for console power, you're wrong. The tech doesn't give anyone an 'unfair advantage'. I think FFVI is the best FF ever, and it was for SNES.
2) Sephiroth is a 1-D character. Flat as a board. Get over it. Ditto with cloud. Hey, I liked FFVII. But that's the truth. =(
3) There never was a GTA4. GTA:VC and GTA:SA -are not- GTA4 and 5. They're stand-alone iterations. GTA4 is an as yet unreleased game.
'Ey, Chrome Dome - Violet - 02-13-2006
gta4 is what I call vc, because that is basically what it is, right? Why ruin a good thing...but anywhoo...gta VC pwns all...maybe except need for speed underground 2 for x box. Fuck yeah.....**drools**
'Ey, Chrome Dome - Bra - 02-13-2006
Quote:Originally posted by Violet
gta4 is what I call vc, because that is basically what it is, right? Why ruin a good thing...but anywhoo...gta VC pwns all...maybe except need for speed underground 2 for x box. Fuck yeah.....**drools**
No, it isn't. VC and SA are prequels, they're not continuations of the series.
The timeline is something like this:
GTA: London 1969 => GTA: VC => GTA: SA => GTA => GTA III => GTA 2
Yes, GTA 2 takes place in the future, therefore it takes place after GTA III. VC takes place in 1986, and SA takes place in 1992 (Not sure, it may be '94, I forget which) GTA and GTA III takes place in the present. GTA 4 is -supposed- to take place after GTA III, but obviously, before 2.
'Ey, Chrome Dome - Super Buu - 02-13-2006
If GTA 3 came before 2 in the timeline and is legitimately a continuation of the series, then how come SA and VC coming before are therefore not?
I know VC and SA aren't GTA 4, but I had to point out that little flaw in the argument.
'Ey, Chrome Dome - Violet - 02-13-2006
ok...I don't get into video games -that- much and it would be futile of me (especially in my state at the mooment) to debate, because, well, you do speak sense. Kudos. ^^ j00 win