| The following warnings occurred: | |||||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.3.31 (Linux)
|
![]() |
|
Female Signatures - Printable Version +- CDBZ Archive (http://alex.zulenka.com) +-- Forum: Out of Character Forums (http://alex.zulenka.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Forum: The Legendary Asylum (http://alex.zulenka.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=133) +--- Thread: Female Signatures (/showthread.php?tid=35073) |
Female Signatures - Super Buu - 10-03-2006 Tch, of course I know. I've played the guy on Metroid Prime: Hunters. >_> Female Signatures - Kirano - 10-03-2006 Quote:Originally posted by Bebi *looks at sig* O.o Female Signatures - Vegeta - 10-03-2006 Quote:Originally posted by Hellfighter 17 signatures != art Female Signatures - Raditzu - 10-03-2006 Tsk tsk. Now you're going to turn this into an argument about what art is. Female Signatures - Vegeta - 10-03-2006 whatever art is, it's not web graphics Female Signatures - Raditzu - 10-03-2006 To some, sure. Female Signatures - Android-18 - 10-03-2006 Look no panties =P. Female Signatures - Burter - 10-03-2006 Quote:Originally posted by Waffuru Define art, in your own words Female Signatures - Belle Hibiki - 10-03-2006 Sexuality in sigs has never bothered me, really. It's when this sexuality continually attached to a character who has - as far as I've seen - next to none that it gets... I'm searching for a word. Irritating? Blue-balling? Something along those lines? The concept would be similar to me putting Kid Buu in a one-piece bathing costume in my sig, with happy smiley faces, and then pulling the afore-mentioned spinal strangulation regularly in RP. I would think it pretty weird. I tend to perceive sigs as a representation of the character, in content and in spirit, rather than as something to show off with. /selfindulgence off Female Signatures - Android-18 - 10-03-2006 There are no panties in my sig, only a thigh. Female Signatures - Burter - 10-03-2006 That's way too different to be your character, 18. =/ Female Signatures - Violet - 10-03-2006 Rad had said it was ok, though, Burt. >.> EDIT: It was an older thread. >.> Anyhoo, might want to go talk to Rad or something, 18. Female Signatures - Android-18 - 10-03-2006 No apparently it isn't, even though she looked almost indentical to a signature he once was fine with. Forget it. Female Signatures - Burter - 10-03-2006 Quote:Originally posted by Violet No he didn't. EDIT: He denied it. Female Signatures - Violet - 10-03-2006 Read the edit. =P Female Signatures - Burter - 10-03-2006 Read mine. Female Signatures - Bra - 10-04-2006 I don't get it. The char 18's using looks rather like 18. Just less... intense. Where's the issue? Female Signatures - Android-18 - 10-04-2006 Not this sig, this one.
Female Signatures - Bra - 10-04-2006 Oh, okay. My bad, sorry for interfering. Female Signatures - Raditzu - 10-04-2006 You should be. |