The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.5.12 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code 2 errorHandler->error_callback
/printthread.php 287 eval
/printthread.php 117 printthread_multipage



CDBZ Archive
The Like/Hate Thread - Printable Version

+- CDBZ Archive (http://alex.zulenka.com)
+-- Forum: Out of Character Forums (http://alex.zulenka.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: The Legendary Asylum (http://alex.zulenka.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=133)
+--- Thread: The Like/Hate Thread (/showthread.php?tid=13015)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765


The Like/Hate Thread - Ashe - 05-18-2010

Vad Wrote:That's rather broad considering he's done segments using historic fact.

Ok, I'll give him that he's done a few segments that use facts, sure.


The Like/Hate Thread - Josh - 05-18-2010

Ashe Wrote:Ok, I'll give him that he's done a few segments that use facts, sure.

Like "Hitler was a bad man", and "The sky is blue". Those are factual things he may say.


The Like/Hate Thread - Vad - 05-18-2010

Josh Wrote:Like "Hitler was a bad man", and "The sky is blue". Those are factual things he may say.

xD!

I watch Charles Krauthammer anyway.


The Like/Hate Thread - Ashe - 05-18-2010

I just got a kick out of his random penis drawing when he was talking about climate change. "Clearly global warming isn't true, because its snowing right now!" *gives serious stare at screen* I mean... really? He either doesn't understand what he's talking about, or is intentionally lying. And he's stated before that he's not a news caster but an entertainer.

EDIT: I'd give O'Reilly the most credit on that station, however, he frustrates me for different reasons. He'll be talking about something and be one hundred percent in the right about what he's talking about, and then suddenly he does a complete 180 and goes the opposite direction. Along the lines of "1+1=2, so if you add +1 again, the answer is PINEAPPLE!" I'll be following till that and be like "Wait, wtf?" I also get really frustrated at how often he just shouts down his guests, BUT I will say that I'm not convinced its as intentional as the others. I think in his case that he just gets so caught up in the argument that he loses track of himself. There's this blond chick (not Greta, but one of the other really fake blonds) that constantly is bad about it.

I also just love when the bring the priest on. That priest has no idea what he's talking about either, but they let him talk for 5 straight minutes, then the moment the guest gets told "Go ahead" and tries to rebuke the claims, he gets talked over by the host who then switches back and lets the priest talk for 5 more minutes in silence, then goes back, interrupts the other guy again and says "That's all the time we have, thanks for coming, Father, as always you get the last word out of respect," and passes right back to the priest.


The Like/Hate Thread - Vad - 05-18-2010

Ashe Wrote:I just got a kick out of his random penis drawing when he was talking about climate change. "Clearly global warming isn't true, because its snowing right now!" *gives serious stare at screen* I mean... really? He either doesn't understand what he's talking about, or is intentionally lying. And he's stated before that he's not a news caster but an entertainer.

Eh. He's stating an extreme right view trying to bash an extreme left view about global warming. Both are extremely far fetched.

Fun Fact: My mom used to work in the same radio building as him in Connecticut. She witnessed him punch out a guy from the competitor radio show in the same building.


The Like/Hate Thread - Ashe - 05-18-2010

Vad Wrote:Eh. He's stating an extreme right view trying to bash an extreme left view about global warming. Both are extremely far fetched.

Well, the point behind that comment was that... Global warming theory believes that it gets hotter, thus melting ice caps and evaporating a tiny bit more water every year. Then that means there is more water vapor in the clouds. Which then creates more rain or snow depending on the temperature. So if you have MORE snow, that isn't exactly an argument against it, because "I think its getting colder, not warmer" has nothing to due with the amount of snow on the ground, only whether or not snow happens. Like for example, the Arctic isn't covered in 30 mile thick snow drifts. Its covered in ice, with a fairly normal amount of snow. Going further below freezing doesn't mean more things freeze, it just means "if its freezable, then it'll freeze", and the amount depends on how much vapor is in the air. Which was the complete opposite of what he was saying.


The Like/Hate Thread - Vad - 05-18-2010

Ashe Wrote:Well, the point behind that comment was that... Global warming theory believes that it gets hotter, thus melting ice caps and evaporating a tiny bit more water every year. Then that means there is more water vapor in the clouds. Which then creates more rain or snow depending on the temperature. So if you have MORE snow, that isn't exactly an argument against it, because "I think its getting colder, not warmer" has nothing to due with the amount of snow on the ground, only whether or not snow happens. Like for example, the Arctic isn't covered in 30 mile thick snow drifts. Its covered in ice, with a fairly normal amount of snow. Going further below freezing doesn't mean more things freeze, it just means "if its freezable, then it'll freeze", and the amount depends on how much vapor is in the air. Which was the complete opposite of what he was saying.

That's one view. I subscribe to the scientific side that states the planet is warming naturally. Glenn is never on in the house anymore. We usually have Brett Baier on...then DVR gets started and I run to the basement.


The Like/Hate Thread - Josh - 05-18-2010

Vad Wrote:That's one view. I subscribe to the scientific side that states the planet is warming naturally.

Lol.

You subscribe to the fringe side my good friend, the scientific community is of the opinion that mankind is having a significant effect on the warming of the planet.


The Like/Hate Thread - Vad - 05-18-2010

Josh Wrote:Lol.

You subscribe to the fringe side my good friend, the scientific community is of the opinion that mankind is having a significant effect on the warming of the planet.

Eh. I believe a lot of stuff. To each his own. My statement to Jack remains true.


The Like/Hate Thread - Josh - 05-18-2010

Vad Wrote:Eh. I believe a lot of stuff. To each his own. My statement to Jack remains true.

It's fine to believe what the fringe groups believe, but it's wrong to misrepresent that as the "Scientific side" explanation when clearly the scientific majority(I.E. 90% of the Scientific community) have stated their opinion on this matter.


The Like/Hate Thread - Vad - 05-18-2010

Josh Wrote:It's fine to believe what the fringe groups believe, but it's wrong to misrepresent that as the "Scientific side" explanation when clearly the scientific majority(I.E. 90% of the Scientific community) have stated their opinion on this matter.

I thought you would have learned to not take my words at face value lol


The Like/Hate Thread - Josh - 05-18-2010

Vad Wrote:I thought you would have learned to not take my words at face value lol

And backpedaling. Lol!


The Like/Hate Thread - Tyr - 05-18-2010

I thought the global warming was due to the flying spaghetti monster preparing to save us all after cooking us like noodles?


The Like/Hate Thread - Ashe - 05-18-2010

Well, the "fringe side" argument doesn't really work, as that invokes the popular opinion fallacy. I mean, lots of people used to believe that the earth was flat, and well, that doesn't mean the Flat Earth Society and Malcolm whatever his last name is suddenly became correct. Although they were pretty much proven wrong by the Greeks.


The Like/Hate Thread - Josh - 05-18-2010

Ashe Wrote:Well, the "fringe side" argument doesn't really work, as that invokes the popular opinion fallacy. I mean, lots of people used to believe that the earth was flat, and well, that doesn't mean the Flat Earth Society and Malcolm whatever his last name is suddenly became correct. Although they were pretty much proven wrong by the Greeks.

Actually, it completely works.

I guess opinion was the wrong way to put it, the majority of scientists agree that the facts point to humans having a significant effect on the warming of the planet. Where as the "Fringe" scientists believe that is not the case.

The point is, Vad was misrepresenting the consensus among experts.

Edit: Here is an article about Fringe Science for you. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fringe_science


The Like/Hate Thread - Ashe - 05-18-2010

Josh Wrote:Actually, it completely works.

I guess opinion was the wrong way to put it, the majority of scientists agree that the facts point to humans having a significant effect on the warming of the planet. Where as the "Fringe" scientists believe that is not the case.

The point is, Vad was misrepresenting the consensus among experts.

Edit: Here is an article about Fringe Science for you. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fringe_science

I agree with your statement, I'm just saying that going along with something "because the majority says so" is not a valid reason. Going along with it because you have looked at the evidence is. The problem is that a lot of people eat up what Fox News says because they somehow manage to make two claims at once, those being that "most people (sometimes using an actual percentage) think" while then saying "we're the victimized minority here" regarding the same topic. You can't be both, yet they think so. Numerous times their percentages that they use are from a very specific source that is so skewed from what the rest of the sources state that they then cover this by saying "EVERYONE BUT US IS LYING/BIASED". Then people tend to neglect to look into the statistics and see for themselves where they come from and what their own sources were.

Like when taxes were raised only for those making a specific amount or higher, which amounted to something like 5% of the actual American people, and yet somehow their viewers (and the Tea Party) were running around crying that the Obama Monster had raised taxes for at least 85% of the people. Because apparently that many people make over that number that the taxes were raised from (which he himself fell into, as in he personally paid a very large amount of taxes). The rest of the people got a tax CUT, which apparently equated to higher taxes, according to Fox News.

I loved the video where someone interviewed Tea Party members too and one lady was in a dead serious expression while staring at the guy saying "Did you know that Obama is trying to ban fishing? FISHING." And then widens her eyes and grins like "I MEAN SERIOUSLY WOW". Because someone probably told her he was and she suddenly believed it, having not looked for said bill herself.


The Like/Hate Thread - Josh - 05-18-2010

Ashe Wrote:I agree with your statement, I'm just saying that going along with something "because the majority says so" is not a valid reason.

I agree with that, but like I said. Vad misrepresented what the scientific community agrees on in his post, and I said it's fine to believe the fringe science(plate tectonics was a Fringe Science). Also science doesn't go by popular opinion, it goes by what the evidence shows.


The Like/Hate Thread - Ashe - 05-18-2010

Josh Wrote:I agree with that, but like I said. Vad misrepresented what the scientific community agrees on in his post, and I said it's fine to believe the fringe science(plate tectonics was a Fringe Science). Also science doesn't go by popular opinion, it goes by what the evidence shows.

I agree with that.


The Like/Hate Thread - Josh - 05-18-2010

Ashe Wrote:I agree with that.

You know the majority of people say that I am sexy, and some say I should try and get a job at Fox.

Wink, wink, nudge, nudge.


The Like/Hate Thread - Ashe - 05-18-2010

Josh Wrote:You know the majority of people say that I am sexy, and some say I should try and get a job at Fox.

Wink, wink, nudge, nudge.

Fair and Balanced. *consults a priest regarding what the establishment clause on separation of church and state REALLY means*