| The following warnings occurred: | |||||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.5.12 (Linux)
|
![]() |
|
The Like/Hate Thread - Printable Version +- CDBZ Archive (http://alex.zulenka.com) +-- Forum: Out of Character Forums (http://alex.zulenka.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Forum: The Legendary Asylum (http://alex.zulenka.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=133) +--- Thread: The Like/Hate Thread (/showthread.php?tid=13015) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
|
The Like/Hate Thread - Ashe - 05-18-2010 Vad Wrote:That's rather broad considering he's done segments using historic fact. Ok, I'll give him that he's done a few segments that use facts, sure. The Like/Hate Thread - Josh - 05-18-2010 Ashe Wrote:Ok, I'll give him that he's done a few segments that use facts, sure. Like "Hitler was a bad man", and "The sky is blue". Those are factual things he may say. The Like/Hate Thread - Vad - 05-18-2010 Josh Wrote:Like "Hitler was a bad man", and "The sky is blue". Those are factual things he may say. xD! I watch Charles Krauthammer anyway. The Like/Hate Thread - Ashe - 05-18-2010 I just got a kick out of his random penis drawing when he was talking about climate change. "Clearly global warming isn't true, because its snowing right now!" *gives serious stare at screen* I mean... really? He either doesn't understand what he's talking about, or is intentionally lying. And he's stated before that he's not a news caster but an entertainer. EDIT: I'd give O'Reilly the most credit on that station, however, he frustrates me for different reasons. He'll be talking about something and be one hundred percent in the right about what he's talking about, and then suddenly he does a complete 180 and goes the opposite direction. Along the lines of "1+1=2, so if you add +1 again, the answer is PINEAPPLE!" I'll be following till that and be like "Wait, wtf?" I also get really frustrated at how often he just shouts down his guests, BUT I will say that I'm not convinced its as intentional as the others. I think in his case that he just gets so caught up in the argument that he loses track of himself. There's this blond chick (not Greta, but one of the other really fake blonds) that constantly is bad about it. I also just love when the bring the priest on. That priest has no idea what he's talking about either, but they let him talk for 5 straight minutes, then the moment the guest gets told "Go ahead" and tries to rebuke the claims, he gets talked over by the host who then switches back and lets the priest talk for 5 more minutes in silence, then goes back, interrupts the other guy again and says "That's all the time we have, thanks for coming, Father, as always you get the last word out of respect," and passes right back to the priest. The Like/Hate Thread - Vad - 05-18-2010 Ashe Wrote:I just got a kick out of his random penis drawing when he was talking about climate change. "Clearly global warming isn't true, because its snowing right now!" *gives serious stare at screen* I mean... really? He either doesn't understand what he's talking about, or is intentionally lying. And he's stated before that he's not a news caster but an entertainer. Eh. He's stating an extreme right view trying to bash an extreme left view about global warming. Both are extremely far fetched. Fun Fact: My mom used to work in the same radio building as him in Connecticut. She witnessed him punch out a guy from the competitor radio show in the same building. The Like/Hate Thread - Ashe - 05-18-2010 Vad Wrote:Eh. He's stating an extreme right view trying to bash an extreme left view about global warming. Both are extremely far fetched. Well, the point behind that comment was that... Global warming theory believes that it gets hotter, thus melting ice caps and evaporating a tiny bit more water every year. Then that means there is more water vapor in the clouds. Which then creates more rain or snow depending on the temperature. So if you have MORE snow, that isn't exactly an argument against it, because "I think its getting colder, not warmer" has nothing to due with the amount of snow on the ground, only whether or not snow happens. Like for example, the Arctic isn't covered in 30 mile thick snow drifts. Its covered in ice, with a fairly normal amount of snow. Going further below freezing doesn't mean more things freeze, it just means "if its freezable, then it'll freeze", and the amount depends on how much vapor is in the air. Which was the complete opposite of what he was saying. The Like/Hate Thread - Vad - 05-18-2010 Ashe Wrote:Well, the point behind that comment was that... Global warming theory believes that it gets hotter, thus melting ice caps and evaporating a tiny bit more water every year. Then that means there is more water vapor in the clouds. Which then creates more rain or snow depending on the temperature. So if you have MORE snow, that isn't exactly an argument against it, because "I think its getting colder, not warmer" has nothing to due with the amount of snow on the ground, only whether or not snow happens. Like for example, the Arctic isn't covered in 30 mile thick snow drifts. Its covered in ice, with a fairly normal amount of snow. Going further below freezing doesn't mean more things freeze, it just means "if its freezable, then it'll freeze", and the amount depends on how much vapor is in the air. Which was the complete opposite of what he was saying. That's one view. I subscribe to the scientific side that states the planet is warming naturally. Glenn is never on in the house anymore. We usually have Brett Baier on...then DVR gets started and I run to the basement. The Like/Hate Thread - Josh - 05-18-2010 Vad Wrote:That's one view. I subscribe to the scientific side that states the planet is warming naturally. Lol. You subscribe to the fringe side my good friend, the scientific community is of the opinion that mankind is having a significant effect on the warming of the planet. The Like/Hate Thread - Vad - 05-18-2010 Josh Wrote:Lol. Eh. I believe a lot of stuff. To each his own. My statement to Jack remains true. The Like/Hate Thread - Josh - 05-18-2010 Vad Wrote:Eh. I believe a lot of stuff. To each his own. My statement to Jack remains true. It's fine to believe what the fringe groups believe, but it's wrong to misrepresent that as the "Scientific side" explanation when clearly the scientific majority(I.E. 90% of the Scientific community) have stated their opinion on this matter. The Like/Hate Thread - Vad - 05-18-2010 Josh Wrote:It's fine to believe what the fringe groups believe, but it's wrong to misrepresent that as the "Scientific side" explanation when clearly the scientific majority(I.E. 90% of the Scientific community) have stated their opinion on this matter. I thought you would have learned to not take my words at face value lol The Like/Hate Thread - Josh - 05-18-2010 Vad Wrote:I thought you would have learned to not take my words at face value lol And backpedaling. Lol! The Like/Hate Thread - Tyr - 05-18-2010 I thought the global warming was due to the flying spaghetti monster preparing to save us all after cooking us like noodles? The Like/Hate Thread - Ashe - 05-18-2010 Well, the "fringe side" argument doesn't really work, as that invokes the popular opinion fallacy. I mean, lots of people used to believe that the earth was flat, and well, that doesn't mean the Flat Earth Society and Malcolm whatever his last name is suddenly became correct. Although they were pretty much proven wrong by the Greeks. The Like/Hate Thread - Josh - 05-18-2010 Ashe Wrote:Well, the "fringe side" argument doesn't really work, as that invokes the popular opinion fallacy. I mean, lots of people used to believe that the earth was flat, and well, that doesn't mean the Flat Earth Society and Malcolm whatever his last name is suddenly became correct. Although they were pretty much proven wrong by the Greeks. Actually, it completely works. I guess opinion was the wrong way to put it, the majority of scientists agree that the facts point to humans having a significant effect on the warming of the planet. Where as the "Fringe" scientists believe that is not the case. The point is, Vad was misrepresenting the consensus among experts. Edit: Here is an article about Fringe Science for you. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fringe_science The Like/Hate Thread - Ashe - 05-18-2010 Josh Wrote:Actually, it completely works. I agree with your statement, I'm just saying that going along with something "because the majority says so" is not a valid reason. Going along with it because you have looked at the evidence is. The problem is that a lot of people eat up what Fox News says because they somehow manage to make two claims at once, those being that "most people (sometimes using an actual percentage) think" while then saying "we're the victimized minority here" regarding the same topic. You can't be both, yet they think so. Numerous times their percentages that they use are from a very specific source that is so skewed from what the rest of the sources state that they then cover this by saying "EVERYONE BUT US IS LYING/BIASED". Then people tend to neglect to look into the statistics and see for themselves where they come from and what their own sources were. Like when taxes were raised only for those making a specific amount or higher, which amounted to something like 5% of the actual American people, and yet somehow their viewers (and the Tea Party) were running around crying that the Obama Monster had raised taxes for at least 85% of the people. Because apparently that many people make over that number that the taxes were raised from (which he himself fell into, as in he personally paid a very large amount of taxes). The rest of the people got a tax CUT, which apparently equated to higher taxes, according to Fox News. I loved the video where someone interviewed Tea Party members too and one lady was in a dead serious expression while staring at the guy saying "Did you know that Obama is trying to ban fishing? FISHING." And then widens her eyes and grins like "I MEAN SERIOUSLY WOW". Because someone probably told her he was and she suddenly believed it, having not looked for said bill herself. The Like/Hate Thread - Josh - 05-18-2010 Ashe Wrote:I agree with your statement, I'm just saying that going along with something "because the majority says so" is not a valid reason. I agree with that, but like I said. Vad misrepresented what the scientific community agrees on in his post, and I said it's fine to believe the fringe science(plate tectonics was a Fringe Science). Also science doesn't go by popular opinion, it goes by what the evidence shows. The Like/Hate Thread - Ashe - 05-18-2010 Josh Wrote:I agree with that, but like I said. Vad misrepresented what the scientific community agrees on in his post, and I said it's fine to believe the fringe science(plate tectonics was a Fringe Science). Also science doesn't go by popular opinion, it goes by what the evidence shows. I agree with that. The Like/Hate Thread - Josh - 05-18-2010 Ashe Wrote:I agree with that. You know the majority of people say that I am sexy, and some say I should try and get a job at Fox. Wink, wink, nudge, nudge. The Like/Hate Thread - Ashe - 05-18-2010 Josh Wrote:You know the majority of people say that I am sexy, and some say I should try and get a job at Fox. Fair and Balanced. *consults a priest regarding what the establishment clause on separation of church and state REALLY means* |