The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.5.12 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code 2 errorHandler->error_callback
/printthread.php 287 eval
/printthread.php 117 printthread_multipage



CDBZ Archive
We Want to Know - Printable Version

+- CDBZ Archive (http://alex.zulenka.com)
+-- Forum: Out of Character Forums (http://alex.zulenka.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: The Legendary Asylum (http://alex.zulenka.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=133)
+--- Thread: We Want to Know (/showthread.php?tid=37088)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5


We Want to Know - Grandpa Gohan - 12-31-2006

On one hand, yeah, I'd love to be staff here, simply because I love the community. On another hand, i would absolutely dred it, for the constant PM's/AIM's ect.

I know Yamu has kinda experianced it, and I know Kakarot has, along with every other staff thats been a staff for a couple months. When you're working on something, and you think its finally to the point of revealing it to someone else, only to be met with "It sucks". Well I don't think I need to say that I myself would be a little agitated. Though if the person had simply said "It sucks because. . ." I'd probably be a lot more receptive to their point of view.

Spop: xD Ill have a post up soon, having trouble starting it though. New character and all.

>.> I'm so done posting in this thread for awhile.


We Want to Know - Burter - 12-31-2006

I have a question for everyone. List five people you would like to see on staff in the future. That way we at least have a small idea.

My list would be: Garlic Jr, Broli, Yamu, Kakarot and SB


We Want to Know - Whompt - 12-31-2006

Yamu. Supes. Sno. Kakarot. And me. ^_^ Cuz I rock.


We Want to Know - Reijin - 12-31-2006

@Broli - I didn't realize it at the time, but my comment was not worded correctly. I intended it to be an exaggerated point of view being seen in more of a comedic light, like that M&M commercial or something, but yeah, I still don't know how to word anything, so I apologize for that bad wording.


We Want to Know - Broli - 12-31-2006

Quote:Originally posted by Reijin
@Broli - I didn't realize it at the time, but my comment was not worded correctly. I intended it to be an exaggerated point of view being seen in more of a comedic light, like that M&M commercial or something, but yeah, I still don't know how to word anything, so I apologize for that bad wording.

It's ok, man. As I already said, I was surprised you said it because I didn't expect that from you at all.

Miscommunication = All the World's Problems.


We Want to Know - Grandpa Gohan - 12-31-2006

I share the same list as Burter.


We Want to Know - Celipa - 12-31-2006

I agree with two of those choices in particular.

My list would be:

Super Buu, Grandpa Gohan, Garlic Jr, Sno, and Violet if she had more time on her hands and hadn't lost internet. =/


We Want to Know - Spencinator - 12-31-2006

Quote:Originally posted by Burter
I have a question for everyone. List five people you would like to see on staff in the future. That way we at least have a small idea.

My list would be: Garlic Jr, Broli, Yamu, Kakarot and SB
Whoa, you have everyone on my list. O_o;;

Er, anyway. Broli, Yamu, Kakarot, SB, and Garlic Jr. are people I'd like to see staffed in the near future. =0

EDIT:
I chose all five of them because they all seem to have a very good sense of maturity, and all of them know the RPG quite well. ^_^


We Want to Know - Burter - 12-31-2006

Chi Chi has had the most helpful post in this entire thread


We Want to Know - Krillin - 12-31-2006

Quote:Originally posted by Raditzu
Hey staffers, this is a place for members to say what they think is a problem. Its not a place to go back and forth about whether or not they're right. These are opinions, and opinions have nothing to do with being right or wrong.

If we're supposed to take these opinions seriously, then it is absolutely essential that they are examined beforehand. If I had known you just wanted us to throw all of these opinions into a pile and weeded out the ones that "sounded right", I wouldn't have said anything.

Oh, and to everyone that said, "Staff just shoots down ideas," then alluded to my manner of examination, you guys can piss off. I'm simply trying to work with Broli here to get to the heart of the issue, and all I have are a few members (who I do NOT have problems naming: Yamu and Minoshia are the ones I remember) that are denouncing the work here. This fucking thread was to address issues. My examinations are there to clarify the situation. Can you please get off my fucking back with the whole "Staff's closed-minded" mentality, and let this get worked out?

Again, if any of you actually knew me worth a lick, you'd know I'm not one to call "closed-minded". If something fucking works, I'll run with it.

I didn't see the logic Broli was presenting, so I questioned it. According to some of you, I should have simply left that alone. And would have happened? I would have been forced to disregard everything Broli had said, as I can't very well take something to heart if my mind isn't at terms with it. I had hoped through this discussion, we'd shed some light on the issue, but apparently, some of you would much rather make witty statements against this method instead of actually addressing some issues.

So cool. I'll stay the fuck out. I'll just read.


We Want to Know - Raditzu - 12-31-2006

Yeah... well... I'm just going to lock this.

If you have anything you want to add, or something you don't think was addressed, please feel free to PM either myself or Reijin.

Thanks to everyone who posted.