+- CDBZ Archive (http://alex.zulenka.com)
+-- Forum: Out of Character Forums (http://alex.zulenka.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: Other Games (http://alex.zulenka.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=26)
+--- Thread: Performance Vs. Graphics in PC games (/showthread.php?tid=12943)
Performance Vs. Graphics in PC games - Super Buu - 11-08-2008
We have a scale, and on one end is 'amazing graphics at 1FPS' and on the other is 'shitty graphics and no performance issues whatsoever'. Most people will find a happy medium, but I'm curious about where that happy medium is for most people. Obviously this is theoretical since sometimes you can have shitty graphics and performance or its opposite.
I will always have PC games at the lowest graphical setting where there are no performance issues whatsoever, or just the lowest graphical setting if that's not possible. The exception to this is draw distance in large, open games and other issues which noticeably affect how visible some things are.
I kind of assumed that was the norm for a long time (like I do with a lot of things I assume are the norm) but over the years I've been exposed to more people who are closer to the other end of the scale than me. So now I wanna know to what extent I am/was wrong.
Btw, I'm not looking to debate about what setup people 'should' use. But if you want to elaborate on your reasons, feel free.
Performance Vs. Graphics in PC games - Cain - 11-08-2008
My average fps in FEAR is 17.
Performance Vs. Graphics in PC games - Rem-13 - 11-08-2008
I just play at whatever setting means I dont have to play a slideshow.
Performance Vs. Graphics in PC games - Kaden - 11-09-2008
I'm almost always willing to sacrifice a bit of performance for graphics. Light chunking is tolerable.
I don't really know why or when I developed this preference, but I just don't like graphics looking muddy or low-res. It bugs me. Moreso than a laggy mouse does, at least.
Performance Vs. Graphics in PC games - Orion - 11-09-2008
I'm not slanted either way. If it won't run well with medium settings, I'll drag it down till it works. However, I will push the settings up if I can get better graphics while still getting same playrate.
Performance Vs. Graphics in PC games - Vad - 11-09-2008
36 FPS all High Age of Conan. With slight twitching. Works for me.
Performance Vs. Graphics in PC games - Ashe - 11-09-2008
Baldwin Glendale Wrote:36 FPS all High Age of Conan. With slight twitching. Works for me.
I think the shocker here is not that you manage to attain that amount of FPS on that game, but the fact that someone is still playing AoC period.
Performance Vs. Graphics in PC games - Vad - 11-09-2008
Reijin Wrote:I think the shocker here is not that you manage to attain that amount of FPS on that game, but the fact that someone is still playing AoC period.
I'm not. Quit in August. School started in September. 54 Assassin going through Old Tantaria. Yeah. ZzzzzZzzz
My entire guild left so I did. We still talk though.
Performance Vs. Graphics in PC games - Medraut - 11-09-2008
I use to be the type of low graphics, max performance, but that was for WoW.
Than I went to AoC and EQ2 and decided to shell out the cash for better PC parts.
Now I'm all graphics, and take the slight lag for performance.
Performance Vs. Graphics in PC games - Waffuru - 11-09-2008
I lean towards performance usually. Although, I always start at the highest settings and work my way down until I find the settings where the game runs smoothly in action.
Though to be honest, I usually just buy new hardware when I can't run a game at near max settings. Always seems like a good excuse.
Performance Vs. Graphics in PC games - Alura - 11-09-2008
I hardly notice graphics unless it's really bad, or really good. If it's inbetween, I don't even mention it