Posts: 492
Threads: 1,654
Joined: Jan 2004
Critism about last year's game should go here. Tell me what needs to be added, removed, or changed
This is only for people who played or followed last year. This is not a question thread
Want a cookie?
Posts: 492
Threads: 1,654
Joined: Jan 2004
I'm still thinking up ways to stop people from getting into the same groups as last time. Unfortunetly, I've gotten nowhere and I doubt I'll have put a rule on it
I HOPE everyone plays for themselves this time and not for their alliance. Obviously teaming up is allowed, but let's not have DA06 Part 2. This should be a new game, with new groupings and new stories
Want a cookie?
Posts: 63
Threads: 81
Joined: Jun 2004
Do the show popularity thing all the way through the competition. You stopped doing it after Day 1 last year, and i really enjoyed that aspect. It's fun to see the faces and heels of the competition.
Posts: 39
Threads: 58
Joined: Sep 2005
OMG. ARE YOU BACK!?
=O
And yeah, I think I might go solo for this competition. Huge groups ftl.
Standing on a hill in my mountain of dreams
Telling myself its not as hard, hard, hard as it seems
Posts: 492
Threads: 1,654
Joined: Jan 2004
Quote:Originally posted by Minoshia
Do the show popularity thing all the way through the competition. You stopped doing it after Day 1 last year, and i really enjoyed that aspect. It's fun to see the faces and heels of the competition.
I'll do the best I can. I'll definetly try.
Want a cookie?
Posts: 85
Threads: 174
Joined: Jan 2004
Eliminate the ability to spot one another.
Or at least, severely limit it.
Not like you didn't already know about it.
Might be funny to see a couple super alliances accidentally wander into each other.
"I wasted time and now time doth waste me."
"I just made you up to hurt myself, and it worked."
Posts: 492
Threads: 1,654
Joined: Jan 2004
Yea, GPS will be limited, and Sniper Rifle will no longer have the ability to see into squares
I haven't actually decided how to limit it yet. Binoculars will still have the same power
Want a cookie?
Posts: 112
Threads: 443
Joined: Dec 2002
Changing GPS, or eliminating it entirely is my only real suggestion.
Oh yeah, and if you have the time to do the whole popularity thing, that was badass.
"In this world, his world, life is just a game you play"
Posts: 4
Threads: 119
Joined: Sep 2006
Cardboard box would make a kickass joke item. Or make it serious. Just as long as it is involved. =o
"We pissed away all the money on rock n' roll."
-Slash
Posts: 85
Threads: 174
Joined: Jan 2004
Quote:Originally posted by Bojack
Cardboard box would make a kickass joke item. Or make it serious. Just as long as it is involved. =o
I DEMAND A CARDBOARD BOX!
"I wasted time and now time doth waste me."
"I just made you up to hurt myself, and it worked."
Posts: 169
Threads: 575
Joined: Oct 2001
GPS needs to have a 1/4 chance of failure and be a "must activate it to use it" thing. Limit once per day. Failure shows locations wrong, resulted in bad strategy.
"I'm gonna fuck that unicorrrrrn"
Posts: 4
Threads: 119
Joined: Sep 2006
Quote:Originally posted by Reijin
GPS needs to have a 1/4 chance of failure and be a "must activate it to use it" thing. Limit once per day. Failure shows locations wrong, resulted in bad strategy.
I think there should be some items that make a player invisible to GPS. If there isn't something like already... or if Reb will decide to even do GPS.
"We pissed away all the money on rock n' roll."
-Slash
Posts: 169
Threads: 575
Joined: Oct 2001
I'd even go as far as saying it should have a 50% chance of failure.
"I'm gonna fuck that unicorrrrrn"
Posts: 11
Threads: 86
Joined: Dec 2006
I thought of this while posting about a net as a weapon in the weapon thread. . .You should allow an option for defensive playing. Like allow a group, if they so choose, to PM you with certain defenses that they want to set up in their square and pop them into the fights that you'll RP. Of course, if said square lights up as the next to be destroyed, then they have to pack up and move.
ifth = I Find That Humorous
Posts: 492
Threads: 1,654
Joined: Jan 2004
People can do that if they want. I doubt it would have a huge part in the result considering everyone could just do that, but it's possible fodder
Want a cookie?
Posts: 63
Threads: 218
Joined: Jan 2005
Quote:Originally posted by Nail
I thought of this while posting about a net as a weapon in the weapon thread. . .You should allow an option for defensive playing. Like allow a group, if they so choose, to PM you with certain defenses that they want to set up in their square and pop them into the fights that you'll RP. Of course, if said square lights up as the next to be destroyed, then they have to pack up and move.
Complicated.
Dante's Abyss 2007 Runner-Up
Posts: 11
Threads: 86
Joined: Dec 2006
Quote:Originally posted by Yamu
Quote:Originally posted by Nail
I thought of this while posting about a net as a weapon in the weapon thread. . .You should allow an option for defensive playing. Like allow a group, if they so choose, to PM you with certain defenses that they want to set up in their square and pop them into the fights that you'll RP. Of course, if said square lights up as the next to be destroyed, then they have to pack up and move.
Complicated.
If you think of it one way, I suppose it may seem so. However, the way I see it, it wouldn't be. I mean, if you think about it, there are certain items that are simply better as deffensive things. For example, the Ki Sniper Rifle. If I had that in a real competition, I wouldn't walk around hunting people with it, I'd secure a position and let them come to me. Now, what I'm saying is that if I had the Sniper, I would be able to PM or RP that I am hiding somewhere thus giving a slight if any advantage. I suppose it probably would be easier as just fodder. . .
ifth = I Find That Humorous
|