Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Freakin....god...damn...idiots
#21
No, wikipedia is not a credible source. I can say that I'm jesus and list some web site that says that that's true. Doesn't mean its credible.
[Image: RadOct.jpg]
"In this world, his world, life is just a game you play"
Reply
#22
Raditzu Wrote:God I hate wikipedia.

So you hate youtube and wikipedia. Why?
[Image: mowgli.png]
^Props to Aero^
Reply
#23
What is not credible on Wikipedia is flagged by the community. I'v never seen a article on Wikipedia that was false.
[Image: chidorihp1qgrq6.gif]
Reply
#24
The problem with Wikipedia is that some idiots might get the bright idea to write something stupid (like an insult) in a completely inappropriate thread. Some also might have a subjective view on the topic at hand. However, it is true most such articles either don`t have sources or their neutrality is disputed. The links I gave seem credible enough and explain the point we are trying to make.
[Image: amadeus-2.jpg]
Reply
#25
It's true.

I've fucking fought for WEEKS on shit I KNEW was right only to be proven wrong by the staff there. XD So...yeah. They're credible on most things.
The right to swing my fist ends where the other man's nose begins.
[Image: Deo.jpg]
If I tell you I'm good, you would probably think I'm boasting, If I tell you I'm no good, You know I'm lying.
Reply
#26
Most of my issues there have been on format, rather then information. Like, what's appropriate for the article and what isn't.
[Image: BurterJune08.jpg]

Want a cookie?
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)