08-06-2009, 04:26 AM
Right-o, so I'm confusing and can't understand others, bullocks.
Regardless, I don't see how this can be hypocrisy. Women not wearing pants was a cultural thing because back then it was in the culture that they could not wear pants as that signaled the leader in the household (the man), but this became false as women started to be treated as equal beings through out time.
It's a whole other thing regarding homosexuality, I suppose mainly because man and man was never God's picture.
I don't think it was God's idea that women should not wear pants, like I don't think it was written on one of the tablets carried down from the mountain or such.
Not that I know for sure, I'm Protestant and even then I'm not a top-notch one.
Regardless, I don't see how this can be hypocrisy. Women not wearing pants was a cultural thing because back then it was in the culture that they could not wear pants as that signaled the leader in the household (the man), but this became false as women started to be treated as equal beings through out time.
It's a whole other thing regarding homosexuality, I suppose mainly because man and man was never God's picture.
I don't think it was God's idea that women should not wear pants, like I don't think it was written on one of the tablets carried down from the mountain or such.
Not that I know for sure, I'm Protestant and even then I'm not a top-notch one.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]