03-03-2011, 11:04 PM
No, I say we strike at one of them and take our chances.
There's 11 us now; 3 mafia, 8 non-mafia.
So let's take a chance on Raf or Celena, then if we miss the sheriff still has less people to investigate.
As people are eliminated the sheriff will have less suspects. Plus, if he/she is being active, then already 1 suspect is off their list (2 if you include Waff's death). So even if we kill another townsperson, ultimately the sheriff gets to shorten his list. Plus, less people for the nurse to have to worry about guessing to heal.
It's in the best interest of the remainder of us to lynch someone off.
There's 11 us now; 3 mafia, 8 non-mafia.
So let's take a chance on Raf or Celena, then if we miss the sheriff still has less people to investigate.
As people are eliminated the sheriff will have less suspects. Plus, if he/she is being active, then already 1 suspect is off their list (2 if you include Waff's death). So even if we kill another townsperson, ultimately the sheriff gets to shorten his list. Plus, less people for the nurse to have to worry about guessing to heal.
It's in the best interest of the remainder of us to lynch someone off.
![[Image: moyki.png]](http://i1200.photobucket.com/albums/bb324/Aerogfx89/Signatures/moyki.png)
Great warriors are built from great adversity