My post was about the specific comments of a MTG game designer who was using historical references that support the kind of changes that I'm talking about. It upends your argument that I don't know what I' talking about. And you started your post with
"Magic would be boring as fuck if there weren't an element of luck."
Implying anyone said anything close to that is stupid. You are being stupid, meer. Stop being stupid.
"Magic would be boring as fuck if there weren't an element of luck."
Implying anyone said anything close to that is stupid. You are being stupid, meer. Stop being stupid.

