07-23-2012, 06:18 AM
Jonathan Meer Wrote:When using mathematics to prove a point, it's considered good form in argumentation to be as generous as possible. Considering the focal point of the mathematics was the lower-bound of mana (2-3 lands in 20 cards), I selected an amount of mana for the deck that was on the lower end of things, to provide statistics as favorable as possible to your position, to further emphasize how ludicrous your claims are.I said that I played five consecutive games of 12-15 lands, not five games of 2-3 lands. Your reading comprehension is shit, meer. Also, you're a stupid twat to think that statistics matter in any specific instance. Stop being a stupid twat, meer.
Redoing the statistics with 24 and 25 mana only makes the statistics for 2-3 mana in the first 20 cards that much more extreme. You're parroting that as if it's some resounding refutation of everything I've written to this point when it actually further disintegrates your argument.
And, again, the ad hominems aren't helping your case any. This isn't a high school cafeteria debate.

