01-30-2005, 09:46 PM
I know that I said that. I'm aware I'm contradicting myself, but I was just trying to point out that just because what he did wasn't huge doesn't make it bad. I mean, yeah I voted against him because he didn't seem to do everything he could possibly do, but I'm trying to defend him from being judged against just for having a small rules page. I still think he did the least work out of all of us, but I'm just trying to make a point that just because the size of his work was smaller doesn't mean it has to be worse. You can write a 10 page essay on why I am arguing this, and you can just put down a few sentences, and most people would prefer to read the few sentences, because they don't want to bother to read the whole ten pages.

