Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
About inactivness
#18
I don't know what happene dto your original response. I started replying to it, but then when I did it showe dthat it was gone. I believe your original post went along the lines of "Do we really need to be *that* strict?" My response: I felt it warranted a warning. It was blatant spamming, nothing more. Sometimes a pre-warning is given--I only do that if I see fit. If otehr staff disagree with my methods they can tell me so, but I don't believe anything has really been said save for one thing that was settled.
"We're just two lost souls swimming in a fish bowl."
[Image: HFSeventeen.jpg]
Reply


Messages In This Thread
About inactivness - by Tamsin - 12-17-2005, 08:52 AM
About inactivness - by Ashe - 12-17-2005, 08:55 AM
About inactivness - by Tamsin - 12-17-2005, 08:57 AM
About inactivness - by Ashe - 12-17-2005, 09:44 AM
About inactivness - by Tamsin - 12-17-2005, 11:47 AM
About inactivness - by Burter Jr - 12-17-2005, 05:23 PM
About inactivness - by Tamsin - 12-17-2005, 06:45 PM
About inactivness - by Sullivan - 12-18-2005, 02:24 PM
About inactivness - by Sullivan - 12-18-2005, 02:27 PM
About inactivness - by Kaden - 12-18-2005, 02:48 PM
About inactivness - by Sullivan - 12-18-2005, 02:51 PM
About inactivness - by Kaden - 12-18-2005, 05:48 PM
About inactivness - by Sullivan - 12-18-2005, 06:26 PM
About inactivness - by Dave - 12-18-2005, 11:27 PM
About inactivness - by Hellfighter 17 - 12-18-2005, 11:29 PM
About inactivness - by Burter Jr - 12-18-2005, 11:30 PM
About inactivness - by Broli - 12-18-2005, 11:38 PM
About inactivness - by Hellfighter 17 - 12-18-2005, 11:41 PM
About inactivness - by Broli - 12-18-2005, 11:44 PM
About inactivness - by Orion - 12-19-2005, 12:11 AM
About inactivness - by Broli - 12-19-2005, 12:19 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)