01-03-2006, 01:53 AM
eg.
Someone asks how many determination points you need to get an extra tp every week. A member jumps on and knows the answer, saying its 50 (perhaps mixing it up with intelligence by mistake.) The answer is obviously wrong, so the person asking the question is misled, and perhaps makes a judgement with that information. A staff member comes on and sees the mistake, posting the correct number. The person asking the question then sees it, causing confusion and needing clarification on which is correct, which again could affect the decision of the person with this new information.
And you can say 'oh that's well and good, but a staff member could do that too.' I can't speak for everyone on staff, but I know that if I'm not 100% on something, I don't answer it. I wait for someone who does know to answer it.
Someone asks how many determination points you need to get an extra tp every week. A member jumps on and knows the answer, saying its 50 (perhaps mixing it up with intelligence by mistake.) The answer is obviously wrong, so the person asking the question is misled, and perhaps makes a judgement with that information. A staff member comes on and sees the mistake, posting the correct number. The person asking the question then sees it, causing confusion and needing clarification on which is correct, which again could affect the decision of the person with this new information.
And you can say 'oh that's well and good, but a staff member could do that too.' I can't speak for everyone on staff, but I know that if I'm not 100% on something, I don't answer it. I wait for someone who does know to answer it.
![[Image: OrionAug11.jpg]](http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b187/captain_civic/OrionAug11.jpg)