Dana thread #9375

[Raditzu]

Cons: You may have to keep an eye on him to make sure he doesn't do anything wrong, but as far as this one goes, that's what staff should do anyway.

If the cons were that simple, we probably would have let him back in by now. Its not something that you can trivialize with an oversimplification.

He, quite literally, erased years of work that the staff had put into this RPG. He did it by exploiting the trust of the "friends" he had made on this website, and received a permanent ban from Chubbs as a result.

What kind of message or precedent would we show by letting him back in?

You can't try to summarize it in 30 words and have an understanding of the situation. And, to be honest, the "what staff should do anyway" was borderline insulting. If you didn't intend it to be so, then I suggest you actually think about what you wrote before hitting "submit reply" next time.