08-06-2008, 06:50 AM
That's a pretty well-founded opinion. Some of the documentation in the articles are fakes, and I know that because of the dates.
One says:
"March 24, 1997" where correct documentational dating would read "24 March 1997".
But a good number of the documents for military orders do seem legit. Whether or not they could be successfully employed is anyone's guess.
One says:
"March 24, 1997" where correct documentational dating would read "24 March 1997".
But a good number of the documents for military orders do seem legit. Whether or not they could be successfully employed is anyone's guess.
![[Image: Celsigcopy-1.jpg]](http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b330/KiroX2/Celsigcopy-1.jpg)
Standing on a hill in my mountain of dreams
Telling myself its not as hard, hard, hard as it seems