11-13-2006, 06:52 AM
Ok, given things...
I feel that ONLY because we originally gave him a free switch from 13 to Piccolo (due to some promises) and then when Piccolo returned, someone we had said we'd save the character for but didn't under Dana's request, he gets his character back as agreed by Dana's plea. The thing is, instead of going back to 13, he goes to someone else.
Essentially, he got a free switch from 13 to Pan, no strings attached. This is why we are considering it.
We are under two categories. One is that you either return to 13, or get the penalty you dodged through our agreement, since you chose someone else.
The other ruling is "No penalty this time, but a double penalty next time, to prevent this from happening again" due to the few changes.
I'm not totally sure how the ruling will go, because we are almost totally split on vote here.
I feel that ONLY because we originally gave him a free switch from 13 to Piccolo (due to some promises) and then when Piccolo returned, someone we had said we'd save the character for but didn't under Dana's request, he gets his character back as agreed by Dana's plea. The thing is, instead of going back to 13, he goes to someone else.
Essentially, he got a free switch from 13 to Pan, no strings attached. This is why we are considering it.
We are under two categories. One is that you either return to 13, or get the penalty you dodged through our agreement, since you chose someone else.
The other ruling is "No penalty this time, but a double penalty next time, to prevent this from happening again" due to the few changes.
I'm not totally sure how the ruling will go, because we are almost totally split on vote here.

