11-26-2006, 06:33 PM
More closely looked upon, an 'alliance' is defined as a 'formal agreement or treaty between two or more nations to cooperate for specific purposes' where we take nations and replace it with Chubbsians for this purpose.
Anyway, I thought it would look much better on our part if there was some sort of rule stating that you could only form an alliance if you have three (3) or more separate people involved in the pre-creation. Of course this would mean a little more dealing with staff (i.e. the three (or more) making individual PMs claiming their intentions to a member of staff before beginning anything)
Reason? Glancing around and finding all these meager two people groups (not singling anyone out, this has been on my mind for a while) could be more easily looked upon as an IC relationship and nothing more. At least with a third party the alliance could actually start looking formable and have more of a possibility for growth.
Any thoughts? If any should have an idea to help this along, or negate, please voice it.
Anyway, I thought it would look much better on our part if there was some sort of rule stating that you could only form an alliance if you have three (3) or more separate people involved in the pre-creation. Of course this would mean a little more dealing with staff (i.e. the three (or more) making individual PMs claiming their intentions to a member of staff before beginning anything)
Reason? Glancing around and finding all these meager two people groups (not singling anyone out, this has been on my mind for a while) could be more easily looked upon as an IC relationship and nothing more. At least with a third party the alliance could actually start looking formable and have more of a possibility for growth.
Any thoughts? If any should have an idea to help this along, or negate, please voice it.