Burning Crusade: Any Takers?

[Belle Hibiki]

To be clear, what I didn't like about Warlock was the SIMPLICITY of its playstyle, rather than the fact that it 'pwned'. Speccing Corruption was really *the* way to go previously, because all you had to do was slap on the DoTs and then Fear. I have yet to play against a Warlock that doesn't do exactly that. Every time. Maybe they do something different at high levels, but my guess is that they may throw in the occasional nuke; the core spells wouldn't change unless you were trying to be 'unique', which would get you laughed at by other Locks on my server.

Originally posted by Spopovich
Warriors need to be beefed up too. Right now, everything a warrior does can be done by a Paladin, only better. They still hold threat better than a Pally, if only just. But I created a paladin the other day and the difference was blatantly apparent. Things that would have slaughtered my Warrior, my Paladin could handle with ease. -_-;

Er, so you made a judgement about a class after like two days?

Warriors don't need buffing. They're gear dependent, sure, but a warrior with good gear is fearsome to behold. 'Oh but they only do a little more threat'...

So?

Warriors have got Overpower, Mortal Strike (Heroic Strike if you don't want to go that route), Execution move, Hamstring (pwnage against flag runners and casters), DISARM (oh my God people need to do this more), etc. etc.

A Ret. Pally may be good at melee, but it's a completely different style than a Warrior. They are not the same, at all.