Which r U?! >:E

[Jack]

I wouldn't consider Riddick Chaotic Evil either.

[Alexander Trafford]

Chaotic Neutral

[Android 23]

according to the new one, chaotic neutral

[Kaden]

according to the new one, chaotic neutral

You... do realize that none of the alignments actually changed, right?

[Super Buu]

You... do realize that none of the alignments actually changed, right?

Yer but better descriptions.

The wikipedia page described them a lot better for me. Chaotic Neutral probably still describes Rose at the moment, but she's closer to good than evil.

Super Buu started off as Chaotic/Neutral Evil and then slowly slid up to Chaotic/Neutral Good. Though, when I last left off he was back on an angry killing tirade.

This is why I try not to label alignments normally =P

[Ashe]

Personally I've always preferred the Magic: the Gathering method of defining alignment, though most people just assume red = fire, etc.

[Orion]

Depending on the situation, it could switch between any of the neutral scale.

[Celena]

I agree with Supes. The wikipidia page gave a lot more description and that's why I can understand what A23's trying to point out. I actually browsed that page during the custom character discussion before the reset.

Judging by that I'd say Xena fits into Chaotic Neutral/Neutral Evil.

[Vad]

Side note: Vad and I are the only pure blooded saiyans on the site.

WOOT! Saiyan Pride Man! *high five*

[Super Buu]

I judge alignment by two things: first, why they're doing something. Whether it's for a greater good, for self-preservation, for their own ends, because they're bored, or whatever. And then secondly, how they get it done; whether it be through breaking the law or obeying the law, killing or just scaring. Etc. I don't like using a scale since it's all subjective.

[Kaden]

I judge alignment by two things: first, why they're doing something. Whether it's for a greater good, for self-preservation, for their own ends, because they're bored, or whatever. And then secondly, how they get it done; whether it be through breaking the law or obeying the law, killing or just scaring. Etc. I don't like using a scale since it's all subjective.

That's exactly how the D&D alignment determines things...

[Super Buu]

It's generalised, though, and it doesn't fit all characters. I'd rather just state the values outright. So, "he's doing it to help people out, but he's willing to kill and manipulate to do it" rather than Chaotic Good or whatever. The scale also doesn't take into account people's varying opinions of what is good and evil (including that of the character's). Thus why I say they're too subjective.

[Pinky]

The system is meant to keep characters from being pigeonholed into one-response-for-every-situation monotony. The Variations addition specifically means that there's supposed to be freedom for overlap with other alignments in each cardinal (but not diagonal) direction: Neutral Evil can bleed into either Lawful and Chaotic Evil or pure Neutral, or pure Neutral has the ability to dabble into a limited amount of Lawful, Chaotic, Good, and Evil depending on the character's position in a given situation without changing the core personality.

[Rem-13]

Rem is a pretty solid neutral good.

also my favorite alignment chart;

http://img522.imageshack.us/img522/4638/...5glgg8.jpg

[Android 23]

You... do realize that none of the alignments actually changed, right?

Yeah, but they were better explained.

[Juno]

I'd say that Juno is Chaotic Neutral. Disappoints me because a lot of others are that. His character development should shirk him in some different ways, though, so we'll see what happens.

[Mr. Zhu]

Chaotic Neutral.