Rules Clarification

[Zangya]

I'm not sure if this was stated in the rules somewhere, but I just wanted to ask to make sure --

When forming an alliance, do both or just one person pm you?

[Burter]

Anyone in the alliance can move the group at anytime, so communication is vital.

.

[Raditzu]

I think Zangya meant, do both people need to tell you that they're allying with the other person.

[Burter]

Oh.

Yes.

[Reijin]

I'm going to assume that although one person can move the entire alliance they are in at any point, they cannot go "Ok, move everyone but me two squares north to scout things out" or something like that right? I assume they have to be part of the moving group.

[Hellfighter 17]

Also, if there is a danger zone, and the person just wants to be a dick and suicidal, would you make it count?

[Raditzu]

Reijin's said somewhere before that if you lead a group into a Danger Zone, you're the only one that dies.

[Burter]

@Rei: Correct.

@HF: Rad is right. If a group goes into the danger zone, only the person who moved them will die

[Reijin]

Reijin's said somewhere before that if you lead a group into a Danger Zone, you're the only one that dies.

If I have, I don't remember it, but it sounds fairly logical so I don't mind taking credit

[Hellfighter 17]

That's what I was thinking it should be, but I thought Reb might be all, "Choose your alliances better next time, fag."

[Zangya]

That's what I was thinking it should be, but I thought Reb might be all, "Choose your alliances better next time, fag."

I honestly think that that's the way it should be. It's just like the situation with Retane, Tapion, and their various partners. Those guys chose a bad alliance. I chose a bad alliance. We all got pwned b/c of it.

[Raditzu]

"Choose your alliances better next time, fag."

That would be my stance on it. If you're willing to give someone control over your character's movement, you deserve it.

@Rei: I just can't type lately...

[Reijin]

I feel the same as the above three posters, btw.

[Burter]

That would be my stance on it. If you're willing to give someone control over your character's movement, you deserve it.

@Rei: I just can't type lately...

Funny you say that. If I had followed that stance back in 06, you would died with Yamu

[Reijin]

All the more reason I back it.

EDIT: Joking, but basically puts larger groups more at risk of an angry member owning the shit out of them. Its a huge risk.

[Raditzu]

All the more reason I back it.

EDIT: Joking, but basically puts larger groups more at risk of an angry member owning the shit out of them. Its a huge risk.

How epic would it be to see, like, four people walked into a Danger Zone?

I would be laughing my ass off.

[Reijin]

Even better, that large 10 man unbeatable alliance happens to have the wrong person join them who decides "I'm bored. I wonder what happens if I walk the entire expected grand finale group onto that Danger Zone."

I'd probably lose myself right there.

"Um... in an awkward turn of events... The finale has arrive. Its these three random people no one ever expected to get anywhere."

[Hellfighter 17]

"Chi Chi has been crowned winnar!"

[Kirano]

"Um... in an awkward turn of events... The finale has arrive. Its these three random people no one ever expected to get anywhere."

That would be the best DA ever.

[Raditzu]

If we're in CC does our sign up have to be a full-fledged RP?