| The following warnings occurred: | |||||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.3.35 (Linux)
|
![]() |
|
Into the Future - Printable Version +- CDBZ Archive (http://alex.zulenka.com) +-- Forum: LEGENDS - Archived Forums (http://alex.zulenka.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=146) +--- Forum: Turnover Q&A (http://alex.zulenka.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=192) +--- Thread: Into the Future (/showthread.php?tid=38462) |
Into the Future - Old Zangya - 03-13-2007 Stupid edit time. Quote:Originally posted by RetaneI don't deserve to be heard? What's that supposed to mean? Are you downsizing me simply because I haven't been here as long? And Corniss, too. He deserves as much as everyone. We all have our incorrect opinions and false facts, even you. Just to let you know, I forgot what I was going to say to you, but still...Oh, and if there's twenty years in between, you can't just say "Oh, yeah, Retane was lazy and did nothing". That's idiotic. Into the Future - Blind Man - 03-13-2007 Not sure if this will have anything to do with the time lapse (or lack thereof), but will alliances be liquidated or is that a matter of choice? Into the Future - Tobias - 03-13-2007 Whether Its still in effect I'm not sure but last I heard they are being liquidated and you can just reform them if you so desire. Which is another plus on the logic side of things for time skip. Into the Future - Violet - 03-13-2007 just a comment, but what do you mean by liquidate? Like, erase the alliance board completely, and kick everyone out of the alliances they are already in? Into the Future - Tobias - 03-13-2007 I assume it has more to do with coding but, yeah, complete breakdown of all alliances. Just what I remember reading a while ago. Into the Future - Reijin - 03-13-2007 No. Alliances where originally concepted as a gathering of IC allies that were working together to accomplish a certain goal, and it gave them a planning area and they would later dissolve or move on or whatever. Since then, certain alliances have proven that they'd rather bend the character over backwards and have him to do things he wouldn't normally do just to keep him in the alliance, and then it grew into whoever is in an alliance is expected to be a member for life. So its pretty much a given that after the reset, even brand new characters that are run by certain people and have more in common with other people they met around the beginning will somehow find themselves back in the same alliance their creator's were in. At this point the Alliances are more OOC than IC, with it being a gathering of the people behind the characters. Into the Future - Tobias - 03-13-2007 Okay. So what is getting done to alliances? Edit: I reread more carefully. You were 'no'ing my assumption of coding being behind the liquidation? Into the Future - Old Zangya - 03-13-2007 Honestly, I'd prefer it if they were liquidated. Also, I think that someone should have to have IC ties to someone to be invited to an alliance by them, since IC means is what they were originally created for. All invitations should have to be roleplayed out, etc. Into the Future - Kirano - 03-13-2007 Quote:Originally posted by Coola This theory has been looked at number of times. Into the Future - Old Zangya - 03-13-2007 Quote:Originally posted by BulmaObviously. Just reviving it since we're going into the reset. Into the Future - Raditzu - 03-13-2007 Erasing the alliances also has to do with changes were making in alliance concepts and the like. We're not about to stop people from reforming any of their alliances, but they'll find that they don't work 100% the same. Not huge changes, but enough that not all alliance material will translate straight across. It'll make more sense once everything's switched over. Again, you're all welcome to reform any alliances you have no once we hit turnover, but they will be erased from Chubbs when things hit. The new roster won't show existing alliances and all of the current alliance boards will be gone. Into the Future - Kirano - 03-13-2007 Quote:Originally posted by Coola 6 Months, only because I fluid timed. Would have been shorter. Say half that time. Into the Future - Kirano - 03-19-2007 So, are we defiantely having a time skip? Just a heads up, that's all. Into the Future - Raditzu - 03-19-2007 28 for and 18 against. Chances are very good that there will be a time skip. Into the Future - Bojack - 03-21-2007 Whats the difference? Isn't everything starting over/ new characters going to be introduced for the first time anyway? Who does this time shift target exactly? Into the Future - Super Buu - 03-21-2007 It's basically for the people who want their characters to have lived on Kaijin Rala, or those who want their characters to been conceived after the reset. I personally think a lot of the appeal of KR is that it is the sole 'new planet' in the universe, which offers a lot of cool RPing fodder, and the second I agree doesn't make much difference, but there you go. It looks like those of us staying with old characters will just have to deal, or gtfo. Into the Future - Bojack - 03-21-2007 Quote:Originally posted by Super Buu lolz /gtfo Into the Future - Raditzu - 03-21-2007 Quote:Originally posted by Super Buu You don't need to sound so bitter. This wasn't decided by the staff. Its very evident that more members want a time-skip. Into the Future - Super Buu - 03-21-2007 But like I argued before, just because someone thinks something is cool doesn't necessarily mean they would go through with it. My initial post was this: Quote:Originally posted by Super BuuAnd that's still my opinion. This poll is very much a tentative "would you, personally, like a timeskip?" as opposed to "would you advocate the timeskip?" - the latter taking into account the fact that people are now well aware that others are going to be fucked over by it. It's also very bad to use a figure of roughly 60% for to justify fucking over the remaining 40%. You're looking purely at the numbers, and not the context. It's not like those people who want the timeskip so that they can roleplay having lived on KR for the past 5-10 years are actually going to lose much if they can't have that - their storylines haven't even started yet, so they have complete room to mould it. And just so you know, this isn't me accusing you of deliberately misinterpreting things for your own benefit, or 'an attack on Chubbs' in any way. This is just me pointing out a lapse in logic. Into the Future - Violet - 03-21-2007 I've got something I think I can do if the timeskip goes into effect. yay kids. edit: I am trying to look at the bright side of things, although I really want to kick whoever thought of a timeskip. >.> |