03-23-2011, 12:21 AM
So what do we know?
Somehow, we (townspeople) have the power to kill without a majority. That's potentially a huge plus. I can't tell if it's a feature of the game itself (that the no-lynch only overrides a lynch vote if it reaches a majority), or if a person among us has the power to cap a lynch.
As long as that person isn't unlucky, or an idiot, we've got a damn good shot at this (probably too good, but hey, en't complainin).
What we don't know: How many mafia there are. Properly speaking, there MUST be 4; 5 is really too high for 18 people, 3 is simply too low. 4 - 1 = 3. We can't assume that's the case (Rose may be throwing a curveball, and the balance I'm referring to, of course, assumes the power roles are equally balanced; considering day one, and considering we already lost a doc, we may have quite a few power roles, and may need to be concerned about 5 - 1 = 4 mafia).
Of course, none of that really matters jack shit. The game ends when it ends, and we won't know how many there are until that point. Unless Rose slips, or some power role has the ability to know that, or whatever.
Unfortunately, we also don't really have any clues from the last day (unless someone picked up on something I missed). It was pretty straightforward; Waff led a charge against Doe. The mafia, in retaliation, killed waff. There's nothing out-of-the-ordinary here.
YET. I'd say we should start pressuring. Losing one from each side benefits the majority; we have a bit more breathing room than we did in the first day. And, with the pressure, some tidbit may fall loose that, in conjunction with the previous day, leads to some well-grounded suspicion.
IN CONCLUSION, I vote to pressure Rem, for calling a vote against Teemer, following the vote for Doe.
And to enact that pressure:
Lynch Rem-13
(DEFINITION OF PRESSURE: build-up of non-majority lynch votes to force a person to account for themselves. If they slip, the mechanisms are in place for a speedy lynching. If their account is reasonable, then we can lax off the lynch votes without issue. Of course, the fuck-weirdness of getting a kill on 3/18 votes might murk this up a bit, but as of now it's our only real resource. In other words, as before, don't be idiots while I'm asleep)
Somehow, we (townspeople) have the power to kill without a majority. That's potentially a huge plus. I can't tell if it's a feature of the game itself (that the no-lynch only overrides a lynch vote if it reaches a majority), or if a person among us has the power to cap a lynch.
As long as that person isn't unlucky, or an idiot, we've got a damn good shot at this (probably too good, but hey, en't complainin).
What we don't know: How many mafia there are. Properly speaking, there MUST be 4; 5 is really too high for 18 people, 3 is simply too low. 4 - 1 = 3. We can't assume that's the case (Rose may be throwing a curveball, and the balance I'm referring to, of course, assumes the power roles are equally balanced; considering day one, and considering we already lost a doc, we may have quite a few power roles, and may need to be concerned about 5 - 1 = 4 mafia).
Of course, none of that really matters jack shit. The game ends when it ends, and we won't know how many there are until that point. Unless Rose slips, or some power role has the ability to know that, or whatever.
Unfortunately, we also don't really have any clues from the last day (unless someone picked up on something I missed). It was pretty straightforward; Waff led a charge against Doe. The mafia, in retaliation, killed waff. There's nothing out-of-the-ordinary here.
YET. I'd say we should start pressuring. Losing one from each side benefits the majority; we have a bit more breathing room than we did in the first day. And, with the pressure, some tidbit may fall loose that, in conjunction with the previous day, leads to some well-grounded suspicion.
IN CONCLUSION, I vote to pressure Rem, for calling a vote against Teemer, following the vote for Doe.
And to enact that pressure:
Lynch Rem-13
(DEFINITION OF PRESSURE: build-up of non-majority lynch votes to force a person to account for themselves. If they slip, the mechanisms are in place for a speedy lynching. If their account is reasonable, then we can lax off the lynch votes without issue. Of course, the fuck-weirdness of getting a kill on 3/18 votes might murk this up a bit, but as of now it's our only real resource. In other words, as before, don't be idiots while I'm asleep)
![[Image: av50fd.png]](http://i55.tinypic.com/av50fd.png)
Mal Nova Wrote:I do apologize for using the word rape. There are four separate definitions for the word rape, two of which describe vegetation...