08-27-2011, 03:40 AM
(This post was last modified: 08-27-2011, 03:41 AM by Kole T. Merr.)
Anzekay Wrote:This isn't particularly fair. When people are choosing between making certain types of champs more competitive or having more champs to play, of course we're all going to make different decisions. To say that it's someone's fault they don't have runes and they should be at a disadvantage in a duel because of that is a bit silly. Like I've just said, obviously rune usage should be decided on by the two players, but to make a sweeping claim that you are just not playing 'properly' if you choose to buy champs over runes is a bit silly IMHO.
I didn't say they were playing "wrong". I said that they made a choice, and their choice has consequences. It's the same the other way. If you do nothing but buy runes, you'll never unlock new champions to use them with.
EDIT: I do agree that it should be discussed by the duelers beforehand what is and isn't allowed, but justifying that runes shouldn't be allowed because people "haven't gotten them yet" is a bit silly...IMHO.


![[Image: Teemer2003.png]](http://fp.profiles.us.playstation.com/playstation/psn/pid/Teemer2003.png)