Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality
#11
Jarka Wrote:Meer is pretty far from the image of iHypocrite that you're picturing.

In addition, it is possible to be using a system and still protest it. It's called privilege, and it's an important concept in any form of civil rights and social discussion today. A free person need not become a slave in a plantation to argue for emancipation. A man need not throw away his ability to vote in order to argue for women's suffrage. You can recognize the privilege your situation gives you and still say, "This is fucked up and we should find a way to change this."

Ugh, why did I waste my time typing this? You'll just respond with something that kills about 3 braincells per character when reading it.
pfft. peppering the body of his reply with strawmen and junk moralism and emoting left me no room or reason to put any effort beyond that. your own post here fits in nicely with his in those regards: i didnt say he was that guy (i mentioned the other candy-ass for a reason) i simply said he reminds me of him.
[Image: rsz_jqvaz_1.jpg]
Reply


Messages In This Thread
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Pinky - 01-19-2012, 02:21 PM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Rose - 01-19-2012, 09:36 PM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Pinky - 01-19-2012, 10:50 PM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Rose - 01-19-2012, 11:44 PM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Jonathan Meer - 01-20-2012, 12:28 AM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Jarka - 01-20-2012, 04:52 AM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Anzekay - 01-20-2012, 07:56 AM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Pinky - 01-20-2012, 12:58 PM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Jarka - 01-20-2012, 09:19 PM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Rose - 01-20-2012, 09:57 PM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Pinky - 01-20-2012, 11:10 PM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Jonathan Meer - 01-20-2012, 11:50 PM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Pinky - 01-21-2012, 12:27 AM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Tyr - 01-21-2012, 01:58 AM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Vad - 01-21-2012, 02:00 AM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Jonathan Meer - 01-21-2012, 02:32 AM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Vad - 01-21-2012, 02:48 AM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Jonathan Meer - 01-21-2012, 02:57 AM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Vad - 01-21-2012, 03:03 AM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Jonathan Meer - 01-21-2012, 03:15 AM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Rose - 01-21-2012, 03:49 AM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Mr. Zhu - 01-21-2012, 04:27 AM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Vad - 01-21-2012, 04:37 AM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Anzekay - 01-21-2012, 05:41 AM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Jarka - 01-21-2012, 08:31 AM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Rose - 01-21-2012, 09:41 AM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Vad - 01-21-2012, 05:05 PM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Rose - 01-21-2012, 07:17 PM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Jonathan Meer - 01-21-2012, 07:25 PM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Waffuru - 01-21-2012, 11:50 PM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Jarka - 01-22-2012, 12:32 AM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Jonathan Meer - 01-22-2012, 02:01 AM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Pinky - 01-22-2012, 02:19 AM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Jonathan Meer - 01-22-2012, 02:34 AM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Pinky - 01-22-2012, 02:43 AM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Pinky - 01-22-2012, 02:50 AM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Rose - 01-22-2012, 03:20 AM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Sigfried Hunin - 01-22-2012, 03:20 AM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Jonathan Meer - 01-22-2012, 03:29 AM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Pinky - 01-22-2012, 04:01 AM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Anzekay - 01-22-2012, 08:25 AM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Jonathan Meer - 01-22-2012, 01:43 PM
[NO-SPAM] Income Inequality - by Belle Hibiki - 01-22-2012, 07:52 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)