07-30-2006, 06:17 PM
I'm back from the meet full-time now. Did terrible, but whatever.
Alright, I've read pretty much everything that's been posted in here so far, and Bardock's most recent post sums up what I'd like for us to do. I'd also like to incorporate Zarbon's "building" tasks, where they must continue to work on their other tasks while working on their next one. And I also like the idea of Bardock's
"wrench" as he calls it, of the fake PMs. It's not unfair, but it simply shows who's commited to the job, regardless of whether they think they will succeed or not. And Cargo, we can incorporate your idea of making one of the phases individual, if you believe it's necessary, but the staff has to work as a team more often than individuals, so I won't say it's absolutely necessary.
All we really need to do now is make up the tasks that fit each category, throw in some tweaks, add some creativity, and BAM! We're kickin' it up a notch.
Alright, I've read pretty much everything that's been posted in here so far, and Bardock's most recent post sums up what I'd like for us to do. I'd also like to incorporate Zarbon's "building" tasks, where they must continue to work on their other tasks while working on their next one. And I also like the idea of Bardock's
"wrench" as he calls it, of the fake PMs. It's not unfair, but it simply shows who's commited to the job, regardless of whether they think they will succeed or not. And Cargo, we can incorporate your idea of making one of the phases individual, if you believe it's necessary, but the staff has to work as a team more often than individuals, so I won't say it's absolutely necessary.
All we really need to do now is make up the tasks that fit each category, throw in some tweaks, add some creativity, and BAM! We're kickin' it up a notch.

