09-21-2006, 08:06 AM
When I asked the 72 rule question (in terms of waiting 72 hours for updates; I apologize for wording it so confusingly), I was looking to see if there was any intent of abuse. In other words, I wanted to see if the Chubbs Idols would look at it as flood control, or as "Sweet, I still have 2 more days before I have to update this guy's thread." Both SB and Bardock seem to have a firm grip on the purpose of this rule set.
In terms of how much work a staffer should do, I think Bardock hit the nail on the head. When I asked, "How much time should you dedicate to doing your job?" Bardock pretty much said the exact answer I was thinking - as much time is necessary. A lot of people look at staff as a role of prestige, and while the job certaintly does hold that prestige, it also carries an obligation to serve the members (whereas a multitude of members, including myself, have been unappreciative in that factor). And really, you'll find that the difference between Super Mods and Mods is that the SMs are the people who have devoted the most time to serving Chubbs.
You guys both seem to share the same view on inter-staff disputes, which I also agree with for the exact reasons mentioned.
That's it from me; I'm out of questions. You guys both seem to have a handle on what it takes to be a staff member, and I know that whoever the winner is, nothing but improvement is left to come.
Still, a competition is a competition. My vote's for Bardock.
In terms of how much work a staffer should do, I think Bardock hit the nail on the head. When I asked, "How much time should you dedicate to doing your job?" Bardock pretty much said the exact answer I was thinking - as much time is necessary. A lot of people look at staff as a role of prestige, and while the job certaintly does hold that prestige, it also carries an obligation to serve the members (whereas a multitude of members, including myself, have been unappreciative in that factor). And really, you'll find that the difference between Super Mods and Mods is that the SMs are the people who have devoted the most time to serving Chubbs.
You guys both seem to share the same view on inter-staff disputes, which I also agree with for the exact reasons mentioned.
That's it from me; I'm out of questions. You guys both seem to have a handle on what it takes to be a staff member, and I know that whoever the winner is, nothing but improvement is left to come.
Still, a competition is a competition. My vote's for Bardock.