[Suggestion] Approval Ratings

[Aqua]

You are all handpicked volunteers that are on the same site as the members. I know what work goes into running a site, I do it. If you aren't making the members happy, what's the point of doing anything. The purpose of the staff is to make the site as good as possible. "Good as possible" relates to the member base's approval of what's going on. if the member base doesn't agree with what's going on, then it shouldn't be happening. Ergo, this should be, on som elevel, a democracy. I'm not saying every single decision should come to a vote. I'm saying that disallowing the members to have an adequate voice by warning them or locking their threads every time they dissagree is fucked up.